Epsom v. Crandall
| Docket Number | 2018-290 |
| Decision Date | 04 October 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Jones v. Hart
... ... [new] trial, we will not uphold a verdict that is internally ... inconsistent." Epsom v. Crandall , 2019 VT 74, ... ¶ 24, 211 Vt. 94, 220 A.3d 1247 ... ¶ ... 22. We conclude that the trial court did not ... ...
-
CWS Invs. v. Dydo
...necessary depositions); V.R.C.P. 16.3(c)(1)(C) (giving court discretion to award mediation fees to prevailing party). Epsom v. Crandall, 2019 VT 74, ¶ 35, 211 94.[3] Thus, in Epsom, a case for damages for timber trespass under 13 V.S.A. § 3606, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's d......
-
Epsom v. Crandall
...interest running "from the time between the date of the mill receipt [(in late 2014)] and the date of entry of judgment." Epsom v. Crandall, 2019 VT 74, ¶ 37, 211 Vt. 94. We rejected their argument and affirmed the trial court's decision. Following our decision, plaintiffs wrote to defendan......
-
Cookman v. Champlain Valley Plumbing & Heating
...witnesses that she believes supports her position. The trial court has discretion in ruling on a motion for a new trial. Epsom v. Crandall, 2019 VT 74, ¶ 17, Vt. 94. "When reviewing the trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial or for additur on the grounds that the jury's award is u......