Equitable Fire Ins. Co v. Fishburne

Decision Date24 June 1905
Citation72 S.C. 24,51 S.E. 528
PartiesEQUITABLE FIRE INS. CO. v. FISHBURNE.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Magistrate—Dismissal.

The circuit judge has power to dismiss an appeal from a magistrate for want of prosecution, and in so doing there is no abuse of discretion.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 31, Cent. Dig. Justices of the Peace, § 640.]

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Charleston County; Dantzler, Judge.

Action by the Equitable Fire Insurance Company against S. H. M. Fishburne.From an order granting a motion dismissing an appeal, defendant appeals.Affirmed.

Julian Fishburne, for appellant.

Smythe, Lee & Frost, for respondent.

GARY, A. J.This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal.The case of State v. Johnson, 52 S. C. 505, 30 S. E. 592, shows that his honor the circuit judge had the power to grant such an order, and in so doing there was no abuse of discretion.

It is the judgment of this court that the order of the circuit court be affirmed.

To continue reading

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
2 cases
  • Rylee v. Marett
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 19, 1922
    ... ... 592; ... Uzzell v. Horn, 71 S.C. 431, 51 S.E. 253; ... Equitable Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishburne, 72 S.C. 24, 51 ... S.E. 528; Pelzer Mfg. Co ... ...
  • State v. Cottingham
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 29, 1953
    ...law to perfect such appeal. State v. Johnson, 52 S.C. 505, 30 S.E. 592; Uzzell v. Horn, 71 S.C. 431, 51 S.E. 253; Equitable Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishburne, 72 S.C. 24, 51 S.E. 528; Pelzer Mfg. Co. v. Cely, 40 S.C. 430, 18 S.E. 790; rule 23 of Rules of Supreme Court (90 S.E. xi). No return havin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT