Equitable Fire Ins. Co v. Fishburne
Decision Date | 24 June 1905 |
Citation | 72 S.C. 24,51 S.E. 528 |
Parties | EQUITABLE FIRE INS. CO. v. FISHBURNE. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Magistrate—Dismissal.
The circuit judge has power to dismiss an appeal from a magistrate for want of prosecution, and in so doing there is no abuse of discretion.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 31, Cent. Dig. Justices of the Peace, § 640.]
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Charleston County; Dantzler, Judge.
Action by the Equitable Fire Insurance Company against S. H. M. Fishburne.From an order granting a motion dismissing an appeal, defendant appeals.Affirmed.
Julian Fishburne, for appellant.
Smythe, Lee & Frost, for respondent.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal.The case of State v. Johnson, 52 S. C. 505, 30 S. E. 592, shows that his honor the circuit judge had the power to grant such an order, and in so doing there was no abuse of discretion.
It is the judgment of this court that the order of the circuit court be affirmed.
To continue reading
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Rylee v. Marett
... ... 592; ... Uzzell v. Horn, 71 S.C. 431, 51 S.E. 253; ... Equitable Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishburne, 72 S.C. 24, 51 ... S.E. 528; Pelzer Mfg. Co ... ...
-
State v. Cottingham
...law to perfect such appeal. State v. Johnson, 52 S.C. 505, 30 S.E. 592; Uzzell v. Horn, 71 S.C. 431, 51 S.E. 253; Equitable Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishburne, 72 S.C. 24, 51 S.E. 528; Pelzer Mfg. Co. v. Cely, 40 S.C. 430, 18 S.E. 790; rule 23 of Rules of Supreme Court (90 S.E. xi). No return havin......