Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Great Shoshone & Twin Falls Water Power Co.

• Decision Date: 04 March 1918
• Citation: 249 F. 967
• Parties: EQUITABLE TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. GREAT SHOSHONE & TWIN FALLS WATER POWER CO. et al. (PLUMER et al., Interveners). AMERICAN WATER WORKS & ELECTRIC CO. v. TOWLE et al. (PLUMER et al., Interveners).
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

249 F. 967

EQUITABLE TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. GREAT SHOSHONE & TWIN FALLS WATER POWER CO. et al. (PLUMER et al., Interveners).

AMERICAN WATER WORKS & ELECTRIC CO. v. TOWLE et al. (PLUMER et al., Interveners).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 4, 1918

On rehearing. Former decision, reported at 245 F. 697, 158 C.C.A. 99, adhered to.

See, also, 228 F. 516.

Murray, Prentice & Howland, of New York City, and Richards & Haga and J. L. Eberle, all of Boise, Idaho, for appellant Equitable Trust Co. of New York.

Wyman & Wyman, of Boise, Idaho, for appellant American Water Works & Electric Co.

Martin & Cameron, of Boise, Idaho, for appellees Plumer and Scull.

Alfred A. Fraser, of Boise, Idaho, for appellee Shank.

James H. Wise, of Twin Falls, Idaho, for appellee Hahn.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Since the granting of a rehearing in these cases we have listened attentively to the arguments of counsel and have reexamined the statutory provisions of the state of Idaho, as well as the decisions of the Supreme Court of the state upon the subject, and remain convinced of the correctness of the opinion and judgment heretofore announced.

The decree and orders appealed from are affirmed.