Ericksen v. City of Sioux Falls

Citation14 N.W.2d 89,70 S.D. 40
Decision Date07 April 1944
Docket Number8529.
PartiesERICKSEN v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS et al.
CourtSupreme Court of South Dakota

Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 1944.

Parliman & Parliman, Danforth & Danforth and Raymond E. Dana, all of Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellant.

Roy D. Burns and Claude A. Hamilton, both of Sioux Falls, S. D for respondents City of Sioux Falls and others.

Boyce, Warren & Fairbank and John S. Murphy, all of Sioux Falls, S. D., for respondent John Morrell & Co.

VAN BUREN PERRY, Circuit Judge.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as a citizen, resident and taxpayer of the City of Sioux Falls against the City of Sioux Falls and its governing board of commissioners and against John Morrell & Company, a corporation owning and operating a packing plant in said city. The purpose of the action is to have declared invalid a certain contract entered into in 1926 and amended in 1940 between the governing board of the city and John Morrell & Company relating to the disposition of the industrial sewage from said packing plant through the sewage system and disposal plant owned by the city, and to procure an injunction restraining the further use of the city sewage system and plant for the disposal of the company's industrial sewage. The trial court denied injunction and held the contract valid, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court were as follows:

"1. That the plaintiff at the times mentioned in the Complaint was and now is a citizen and taxpayer and resident of the City of Sioux Falls, wherein he has been engaged in the practice of his profession of medicine and surgery.

"2. That the defendant City of Sioux Falls at the times mentioned herein was and now is a municipal corporation of the first class of the State of South Dakota governed by a Board of Commissioners consisting of a Mayor and two Commissioners, and that the defendant John T. McKee is the Mayor and the defendants Bert T. Yeager and Joseph S. Nelson are Commissioners of the City of Sioux Falls and were such officers at all times mentioned in the Complaint.

"3. That the defendant John Morrell & Company at all times mentioned in the Complaint was and is a corporation duly organized and existing according to law with its place of business located in the City of Sioux Falls and was and is a taxpayer of the City of Sioux Falls.

"4. That the defendant John Morrell & Company in the year 1911 built within the City of Sioux Falls a meat packing plant and since such time has operated said packing plant within the City of Sioux Falls.

"5. That prior to the year 1927 the sewage originating within the City of Sioux Falls including both domestic and industrial sewage was discharged into the Big Sioux River; that in the year 1927 the City of Sioux Falls completed the construction of and placed in operation a sewage disposal plant for the treatment and disposal of all domestic and industrial sewage originating within the City of Sioux Falls; that since such sewage disposal plant was put in operation, all sewage entering the Sioux Falls disposal plant from the plant of John Morrell & Company has originated within the limits of the City of Sioux Falls.

"6. That such sewage disposal plant was designed and constructed for the purpose of receiving the industrial sewage from the packing plant of John Morrell & Company, together with other industrial sewage originating within the City of Sioux Falls, and that on the 13th day of September, 1926 the City of Sioux Falls and John Morrell & Company duly and regularly entered into a written contract relating to certain pre-treatment to be given the sewage from the John Morrell & Company plant and sewage pumping costs to be paid by said John Morrell & Company, which written contract was received in evidence as Exhibit 59, a true copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Finding.

"7. That the City of Sioux Falls and John Morrell & Company operated under and carried out the terms of said contract, Exhibit 59, until March 1, 1940, when such contract of September 13, 1926, was amended by an agreement between said parties, duly and regularly entered into on March 1, 1940, which was received in evidence as Exhibit 58, a true copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Finding.

"8. That John Morrell & Company and the City of Sioux Falls have fully performed and carried out the terms of said contract, Exhibit 58, and that pursuant thereto John Morrell & Company has paid for additions and improvements to the sewage disposal plant of the City of Sioux Falls in the sum of approximately $70,549.65.

"From the foregoing Findings of Fact the Court makes the following Conclusions of Law;

"1. That the defendants are entitled to Judgment dismissing the Complaint of the plaintiff on its merits and to judgment for costs."

Except as to the legal effect of the contracts, the evidence supports the findings of the court.

The contracts between the city and the company referred to in the findings were as follows:

Exhibit 59 was a contract dated September 13, 1926, between the City of Sioux Falls (hereinafter referred to as the city), John Morrell & Company (hereinafter referred to as the company) and the Kittery Realty Co. It recited that the city desired to build a sewage pumping station and mains upon and over certain land belonging to the Realty Co.; that the Realty Co. owned the packing house and other lands leased by Morrell & Company; that Morrell & Company desired to have the sewage from the packing plant disposed of through the city main and pumping station, and it was agreed that the city should construct certain mains from the end of the trunk sewer of the city to the pumping plant; that upon completion of such mains, pumping station and disposal plant the company might connect with said main; that the company should install certain suitable equipment for the fine screening, sedimentation and grease skimming of all the company sewage before it entered the mains; that the company should pay to the city its pro rata share of the cost of pumping its sewage and a part of certain fixed and operating charges.

The contract had no time limit. Either party could cancel it at will. The parties operated under it until March 1, 1940 when a contract was entered into as hereinafter set forth.

In the meantime, the record shows, in November 1939 the sewage disposal plant had ceased to function and from then until August 1940, while repairs were being made, the raw or untreated sewage, of the city, including that of Morrell & Company was poured into the Big Sioux River. The city and the company had jointly engaged the firm of sanitary engineers who originally planned the disposal plant and again hired them to survey the situation and make recommendations and plans for the repair and improvement of the plant. This firm had reported that the filter beds were clogged, due to the presence of too much fine stone in the filter bed and the presence of grease in the sewage which had coated and clogged the filter beds, which grease was due to the industrial wastes. Other serious problems had also developed. Both the city and the company had expanded. A large program of corrective measures and improvements was laid out. The city and company were at the time threatened with suits for the pollution of the river. See Ericksen v. Morrell & Co. et al., S.D., 14 N.W.2d 88.

Exhibit 58, referred to in the findings of the trial court as a contract "duly and regularly entered into" is a contract between the city and the company "amending" the former contract. It is dated March 1, 1940 and reads:

"Whereas the City of Sioux Falls, in its municipal capacity, has constructed a sewer system and sewage disposal plant, which said sewage disposal plant is in need of improvements and betterments, and

"Whereas, the sewage originating in the John Morrell & Company packing plant in the City of Sioux Falls has been for many years last past handled through the sewage disposal system of the City of Sioux Falls by virtue of the legal rights of the parties, and an agreement entered into between the City of Sioux Falls and John Morrell & Company, on September 13th, 1926, and

"Whereas, the parties hereto are desirous of amending said agreement of September 13th, 1926, to read as follows:

"Now Therefore, It Is Hereby Agreed that the sewage originating in the John Morrell & Company plant shall hereafter pass from the said John Morrell & Company into the sewage system of the City of Sioux Falls, through connections now established, and that whereas John Morrell & Company has installed, at its own plant, suitable dual equipment of the continuous type fine-screening, John Morrell & Company agrees that all of the sewer water that is to be delivered to the city sewer system from John Morrell & Company, shall be fine screened through said fine-screening equipment at the expense of John Morrell & Company.

"It Is Agreed, in consideration of the payments and expenditures to be made by John Morrell & Company, as hereinafter specified, that the said John Morrell & Company may send into the sewer system of the City of Sioux Falls, and into the disposal plant of the City of Sioux Falls, all of the sewage of John Morrell & Company for a period of fifteen (15) years from and after March first, 1940.

"John Morrell & Company agrees to pay seventy-five per cent (75%) of the total cost of rehabilitation of filters in the Sioux Falls Disposal Plant, which said rehabilitation is now in progress under contract between the City of Sioux Falls and Abraham Ogdie, which said 75% of the total cost is estimated to be Eleven thousand two hundred fifty Dollars, ($11,250.00).

"Further John...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT