Ernst v. American Spirits Mfg. Co.
| Decision Date | 28 April 1902 |
| Citation | 114 F. 981 |
| Parties | ERNST et. al. v. AMERICAN SPIRITS MFG. CO. et al. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
A. J. Dittenhoofer, for the motion.
Alexander & Greene, opposed.
Waiving all consideration of the presence of Reeves as a plaintiff,-- and this court does not find in the cases cited any sufficient ground for disregarding his presence,-- we nevertheless have citizens of New York on both sides of the controversy. As was intimated upon the argument, it is a doubtful question whether or not there is a separable controversy. That being so, the proper course is to remand the cause.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Schwyhart v. Barrett
...of the State court. Fitzgerald v. Railroad, 45 F. 819; Nash v. McNamara, 145 F. 541; Kessinger v. Vannatta, 27 F. 890; Ernest v. American S. M. Co., 114 F. 981; Railroad v. Davidson, 157 U.S. 208; Hanrick Hanrick, 153 U.S. 192; Shaw v. Quincy Mineral Co., 145 U.S. 444. (4) No presumptions c......
-
Nash v. McNamara
...105 F. 657; Groel v. United Electric Co. (C.C.) 132 F. 253, 265; Dodd v. Louisville B. Co. (C.C.) 130 F. 186, 198. In Ernst v. American S. M. Co. (C.C.) 114 F. 981, the said: 'It is a doubtful question whether or not there is a separable controversy. That being so, the proper course is to r......
-
Boykin v. Morris Fertilizer Co.
... ... subject-- one the case of Ernst v. American Spirits Mfg ... Co. (C.C.) 114 F. 981, a decision by Circuit ... ...
- Dudley v. Sanders Mfg. Co.