Esenwah v. Gonzales
| Decision Date | 04 April 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-1075.,04-1075. |
| Citation | 544 U.S. 962 |
| Parties | ESENWAH <I>v.</I> GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 378 F. 3d 763.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Liadov v. Mukasey
... ... U.S. Dep't of Justice, 421 F.3d 105 (2d Cir.2005), and Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611 (9th Cir.2005). On remand, the BIA issued a precedent decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(g), again asserting that it lacked ... § 1252(a)(1), (5). 3 A BIA order denying reconsideration is reviewable as a final order of removal. See Esenwah v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 763, 765 (8th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 962, 125 S.Ct. 1741, 161 L.Ed.2d 604 (2005). But we may review a final order ... ...
-
Zine v. Mukasey
... ... See Bejet-Viali Al-Jojo v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 823, 827 (8th Cir.2005) (extraordinary circumstances issue); Aden v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir.2005) (timeliness issue). As Zine ... See Esenwah v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 763, 765 (8th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 962, 125 S.Ct. 1741, 161 L.Ed.2d 604 (2005). Here, Zine's motion to reconsider ... ...
- Rodriguez de Henriquez v. Barr
-
Onwuamaegbu v. Gonzales
... ... We review the denial of a motion to reconsider only for abuse of discretion. See Zhang, 348 F.3d at 293; see also Esenwah v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 763, 765 (8th Cir.2004) (noting that abuse-of-discretion review of the BIA's denial of a motion for reconsideration is "considerably more deferential than the ordinary administrative-law standard that governs our review of agency decisions"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 962, 125 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results