Esser v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 99CA0106.

Decision Date20 January 2000
Docket NumberNo. 99CA0106.,99CA0106.
Citation8 P.3d 1218
PartiesFlorence ESSER, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE OF COLORADO, Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, and the Colorado Department of Corrections, Respondents, and Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers' Compensation; and Mary Ann Whiteside, in her official capacity as the Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, Intervenors.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Vista Resorts, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • August 8, 2005
    ...that the statutory classification does not bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate legislative purpose. Esser v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 8 P.3d 1218 (Colo.App.2000), aff'd, 30 P.3d 189 The CCPA is a remedial statute intended to deter and punish deceptive trade practices committe......
  • CITY & CTY. OF DENVER v. United Air Lines, No. 98SC431.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • September 11, 2000
  • Ferla v. Infinity Development Associates
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 2004
    ...the court the classification does not bear a rational relationship to a legitimate legislative purpose. See Esser v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 8 P.3d 1218 (Colo.App.2000); see also Christie v. Coors Transp. Co., 933 P.2d 1330, 1333 (Colo.1997)("If any conceivable set of facts would lead ......
  • DEPT. OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT v. Esser, No. 00SC292.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 4, 2001
    ...and sent the case back to the ICAO with directions to require the ALJ to reconsider the claimant's claim. Esser v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 8 P.3d 1218, 1223 (Colo.App. 2000). We hold that section 8-41-301(2)(a) does not require a claimant to provide oral licensed physician or psycholog......
1 books & journal articles
  • Update on Colorado Appellate Decisions in Colorado Workers' Compensation Law
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 30-8, August 2001
    • Invalid date
    ...2001) (App.No. 00CA2099, annc'd 5/10/01). 2. Id. at 3. Id. 4. Id. at 5. 804 P.2d 250 (Colo.App. 1990). 6. Supra, note 1 at 7. Id. at 8. 8 P.3d 1218 (Colo.App. 9. Colorado Dep't of Labor and Employment v. Esser, 30 Colo.Law. 200 (Aug. 2001) (S.Ct. No. 00SC292, annc'd 6/4/01). 10. Ackerman v.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT