Estate of Crawshaw, Matter of
Decision Date | 01 March 1991 |
Docket Number | No. 65136,65136 |
Citation | 806 P.2d 1014,15 Kan.App.2d 273 |
Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Chester D. CRAWSHAW, Deceased. |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Charitable trusts are favorites of the law. When a devise or grant is determined to constitute a charitable trust, courts look with liberality upon the instrument creating the trust for the purpose of carrying out the intention of the donor.
2. Technical rules of construction that prevent conveyances or bequests creating a charitable trust from taking effect are to be disregarded. Moreover, when it is ascertained that the donor intended to create a public charity, the conveyance or bequest will not be allowed to fail because the trustee is incapable of taking.
3. It is appropriate to consider the surrounding circumstances in the creation of a charitable testamentary trust when faced with a question of whether the testator possessed a general or specific charitable intent.
4. It is elementary that the intent of the testator must be ascertained not from a single or isolated provision, but from all provisions contained within the four corners of the instrument and from circumstances surrounding its execution if they are needed to clarify the testator's true purpose and intent.
5. Under the cy pres doctrine, equity will, when a charity is originally or later becomes impossible, inexpedient, or impracticable of fulfillment, substitute another charitable object which is believed to approach the original purposes as closely as possible. Where the court finds the testator had a general charitable intent, the doctrine applies the theory that equity has the power to revise a charitable trust, in order to meet unexpected emergencies or changes in conditions which threaten the existence of the trust.
6. Under K.S.A.1990 Supp. 59-22a01 and Kansas case law, the doctrine of cy pres permits a court to implement a testator's intent and save a testamentary charitable gift by substituting beneficiaries when the following conditions are met: (1) The gift must be to a charitable organization for a charitable purpose; (2) it must be impossible, impracticable, or illegal to carry out the testator's stated charitable purpose; and (3) it must appear that the testator had a general charitable intent.
Richard D. Ewy and Timothy B. Mustaine of Foulston & Siefkin, Wichita, for appellant Salvation Army, Wichita, Kan.
Paul S. Gregory of Gregory & Gregory, Osborne, for appellee Paul S. Gregory, Administrator CTA.
Daniel K. Diederich and Thomas J. Kennedy of Kennedy, Berkley, Yarnevich & Williamson, Chartered, Salina, for appellees Marymount College of Kansas and Marymount Memorial Educational Trust Fund.
Before DAVIS, P.J., LEWIS, J., and FLOYD H. COFFMAN, District Judge Retired, assigned.
Chester D. Crawshaw left the bulk of his estate in trust to Marymount College in Salina, Kansas, for school loans to nursing students under conditions set forth in his testamentary trust. Soon after his death, Marymount College terminated its existence. The trial court, applying the cy pres doctrine under K.S.A.1989 Supp. 59-22a01 named a successor trustee to administer the funds for the same educational purposes. The remaining residuary legatee, the Salvation Army, appeals, contending that the trial court erred by applying cy pres because the language in the decedent's testamentary trust evidenced a specific charitable intent to benefit students at Marymount College, not a general charitable intent. We affirm.
The case was submitted to the trial court on the following stipulated facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moore v. Moore
...of a will over intestate succession. Parsons v. Smith, Trustee , 190 Kan. 569, 573, 376 P.2d 899 (1962) ; In re Estate of Crawshaw , 15 Kan. App. 2d 273, 279, 806 P.2d 1014 (1991). Second, a disputed will cannot be probated or enforced unless the document has been witnessed and the witnesse......
-
In re Estate of Rickabaugh
...since that's the purpose of a will. Parsons v. Smith, Trustee, 190 Kan. 569, 573, 376 P.2d 899 (1962) ; In re Estate of Crawshaw, 15 Kan.App.2d 273, 279, 806 P.2d 1014 (1991).Applying those standards, especially the principle calling for a review of the entire will to discern intent and mea......
-
Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Kroh Bros. Development Co.
...the principle stated in Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 397 in Barnhart v. Bowers, 143 Kan. 866, 57 P.2d 60 (1936). In In re Estate of Crawshaw, 15 Kan.App.2d 273, Syl. p 2, 806 P.2d 1014 (1991), the Court of Appeals held: "[W]hen it is ascertained that the donor intended to create a publi......
-
Estate of Crawshaw, Matter of
...and whether specific devises and bequests were made to individuals who would have taken the estate by intestacy. Adopting In re Estate of Coleman, 2 Kan.App.2d 567, Syl. p 5, 584 P.2d 1255, rev. denied 225 Kan. 844 3. Charitable trusts are favorites in the law and should receive a liberal c......
-
Navigating the New Kansas Uniform Trust Code: Familiar and Unfamiliar Waters
...For a more detailed discussion of K.S.A. 59-22a01 and the common law doctrine of cy pres., see In re Estate of Crawshaw, 249 Kan. 388, 806 P.2d 1014 (1991). Section 414 provides a beneficial new procedure to terminate an uneconomic trust. Under existing law, court approval was required to t......