ESTATE OF PAINE v. Commissioner
Decision Date | 07 October 1963 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 90015. |
Citation | 22 TCM (CCH) 1383,1963 TC Memo 275 |
Parties | Estate of Robert Treat Paine, Deceased, Francis Cummings, Executor v. Commissioner. |
Court | U.S. Tax Court |
Harold Brown, 85 Devonshire St., Boston, Mass. for the petitioner. Albert R. Doyle, for the respondent.
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
Respondent determined deficiencies in the income taxes of the decedent, Robert Treat Paine, for the years 1954 through 1958 as follows:
Year Deficiency 1954 .................. $1,241.75 1955 .................. 2,520.79 1956 .................. 9,460.58 1957 .................. 447.11 1958 .................. 168.84
The sole issue for decision is whether, in the taxable year 1954, the decedent sustained a deductible nonbusiness bad debt loss, within the meaning of section 166(d) of the 1954 Code, in respect of certain cash payments which he had made to three individuals during the preceding years 1948 through 1953.
The deficiencies determined for the other years 1955 through 1958 resulted from respondent's disallowance of claimed capital loss carryovers in respect of the alleged 1954 bad debt above mentioned; and the allowability of such carryovers is dependent upon the outcome of the issue above stated.
Some of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulation of facts and all exhibits identified therein are incorporated herein by reference.
Robert Treat Paine (herein called the "decedent") died a resident of the State of Massachusetts on August 19, 1961, at the age of 96 years. The petitioner herein, Francis Cummings, is the duly appointed and acting executor of the decedent's last will and testament. The decedent's income tax return for each of the taxable years 1954 through 1958 was filed on a cash and calendar year basis with the district director of internal revenue for the district of Massachusetts.
The decedent, during all years here involved and also for an extended period thereto, maintained an office in Boston where he engaged principally in acting as a trustee and in handling various family and personal matters. His only employee was a secretary, Harriet C. Thompson. He did not maintain any books of account for his personal affairs; but he did have a checkbook out of which he alone issued checks, and he also had files which were kept under his direction by his secretary.
In 1931 (approximately 23 years prior to the first taxable year here involved) a woman named Myra Page Wiren filed a bill of complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Shubert Theater Corporation, United Artists Corporation, Paramount Famous-Lasky Corporation, and certain other corporate and individual defendants. In this complaint1 she alleged, in substance, that she had written a dramatic work and composition entitled "Most," which was described as a fictitious tragedy of three acts; that the defendants had plagiarized this composition in producing and presenting on the stage and elsewhere, another play entitled "Death Takes a Holiday"; and she sought to enjoin the defendants from producing, presenting, publishing or otherwise exhibiting said last-named play, and also to obtain an accounting from them for profits realized therefrom. Myra Wiren's counsel of record in this suit was her brother, Oscar B. Wiren; and both he and Myra's sister, Frances A. Wiren, had financial interests in the proceeding although they were not named as complainants. The litigation with respect to this particular suit continued, as hereinafter shown, until the year 1945.
During the period that said litigation was in progress, the decedent made cash payments to the three Wirens in an unestablished total amount, for the purpose of assisting them in their financing of the litigation. He had no blood relationship to them. The first indication of these payments shown in the evidence herein, is a promissory note (hereinafter identified as "instrument A") which the decedent received in or about the year 1934, and which read as follows:
/s/ Oscar B. Wiren
Subsequently, in 1937, decedent received from the Wirens another instrument (hereinafter identified as "instrument B") which read:
/s/ Myra Page Wiren /s/ Frances A. Wiren /s/ Oscar B. Wiren
And thereafter, in about 1943, decedent received from the Wirens a third instrument (hereinafter identified as "instrument C") which read:
/s/ Myra Page Wiren /s/ Frances Wiren /s/ Oscar B. Wiren
The manner in which the above-mentioned payments were made from the decedent to the Wirens during years prior to 1945 was as follows. The decedent would from time to time personally issue a check made payable to Myra Wiren, and have his secretary mail it to one or another of the Wirens; and shortly thereafter he would receive through the mail, two instruments: One of which instruments was a promissory note which would be identical to instrument A, except as to the date and the amount thereof; and the other of which would be identical to either instrument B or instrument C, except as to the date and the amount thereof. The decedent, after receiving these...
To continue reading
Request your trial