Estate of Sanders v. Detroit Edison Co., 71141

Decision Date15 December 1983
Docket NumberNo. 71141,71141
Citation418 Mich. 882,341 N.W.2d 434
PartiesESTATE OF Leon SANDERS, Deceased, a Minor, and Estate of Walter Sanders, Jr., Deceased, a Minor, by Personal Representative Janie Marie Sanders, and Helen Brazill, a Legally Incapacitated adult, by Marguerite Wourman, Guardian, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. 418 Mich. 882, 341 N.W.2d 434
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of whether the complaint in this matter stated a "claim upon which relief can be granted." GCR 1963, 117.2(1).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1990
    ...pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(9). Karaskiewicz v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 126 Mich App 103, 110; 336 NW2d 757 (1983), lv den 418 Mich 882 (1983)." Id. The Court also rejected the defendant's argument that summary disposition should not have been granted pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) ......
  • People v. Leighty
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • September 18, 1987
    ...438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); People v. Howey, 118 Mich.App. 431, 434-435, 325 N.W.2d 451 (1982), lv. den. 418 Mich. 882 (1983), there is no evidence suggesting such in this case. Defendant inconsistently stated at different times during the interrogation that all of h......
  • Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 18, 1988
    ...to MCR 2.116(C)(9). Karaskiewicz v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 126 Mich.App. 103, 110, 336 N.W.2d 757 (1983), lv. den. 418 Mich. 882 (1983). Defendant also argues that summary disposition should not have been granted pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) because the dispute over the reaso......
  • Longley v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 19, 1984
    ...to GCR 1963, 117.2(3). In Karaskiewicz v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 126 Mich.App. 103, 110, 336 N.W.2d 757, lv. den. 418 Mich. 882 (1983), this Court set forth the standard of review of a motion brought under GCR 1963, "GCR 1963, 117.2(3) allows a trial court to grant summary ju......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT