Estate of Simmie v. C.I.R., 78-3622

Decision Date05 November 1980
Docket NumberNo. 78-3622,78-3622
Citation632 F.2d 93
Parties80-2 USTC P 13,377 ESTATE of Elfrida G. SIMMIE, Deceased, James H. Hays, Executor, Petitioner-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Eugene J. Brenner, Janin, Morgan & Brenner, San Francisco, Cal., argued for petitioner-appellants; Michael L. Curtis, San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Gary Allen, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for C.I.R.; Mary L. Jennings, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief.

Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court.

Before KILKENNY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge. *

KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by James H. Hays, Executor of the Estate of Elfrida G. Simmie, Deceased, from a judgment of the Tax Court in which appellant protested the determination by the Commissioner of an estate tax deficiency of $21,783.72 for the estate tax return filed November 24, 1971. The Commissioner determined that the value of the life estate owned by decedent, for the purpose of ascertaining her gross estate should be fixed by utilizing valuation tables in existence at the date the life estate was received by the decedent, rather than on the basis of valuation tables in effect at the date of decedent's death. He also determined that certain United States Treasury Bonds (Flower Bonds) were includable in the gross estate at par value, rather than at their lower fair market value. The opinion of the Tax Court is reported at 69 T.C. 890 (1978). These are the sole issues involved.

FACTS

The facts are fully stated in the stipulation of the parties and summarized in the decision of the Tax Court, Estate of Simmie v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 890 (1978), in which the Tax Court held in favor of the Commissioner on each issue. We have carefully examined the opinion of the Tax Court on the proper valuation to be placed on the life estate and the proper valuation to be placed on the "Flower" bonds and, because we find no error, it is unnecessary to repeat the discussion contained therein.

In reaching this result, we note that "Opinions of the Tax Court reflect 'that degree of special expertise which Congress has intended to provide in that tribunal.' Sibla v. Commissioner, 611 F.2d 1260, 1262 (9th Cir. 1980). Therefore, we 'should not overrule that body, unless some unmistakable question of law mandates such a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Garrett v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • February 23, 1994
    ...at the time of sale. Cf. Estate of Simmie v. Commissioner [Dec. 35,021], 69 T.C. 890, 892-894 (1978), affd. [80-2 USTC ¶ 13,377] 632 F.2d 93 (9th Cir. 1980). Petitioner was 51 years, 11 months, and 30 days old on December 31, 1987, the date of sale. Under Table A of section 20.2031-7, Estat......
  • Weld v. U.S., 94-5143
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • May 24, 1995
    ... ... Court of Federal Claims denying their consolidated claims for estate tax refunds. Weld v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 81 (1994). The trial ... Cohen v. United States, 995 F.2d 205, 207 (Fed.Cir.1993). Having applied that standard of review, this court concludes that ... Commissioner, 70 T.C. 814, 816, 1978 WL 3345 (1978)); Estate of Simmie v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 890, 1978 WL 3389 (1978), aff'd, 632 F.2d 93 (9th ... ...
  • Lincoln Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Boeshore)
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • March 31, 1982
    ...herein. Sec. 20.2031-10(a)(1), Estate Tax Regs. Petitioners, citing Estate of Simmie v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 890 (1978), affd. 632 F.2d 93 (9th Cir. 1980), argue the 31;2-percent tables of section 20.2031-7, Estate Tax Regs., which were in effect in 1967 when the trust was created, should ......
  • Carnation Co. v. C. I. R., 79-7218
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 13, 1981
    ...the exercise of special expertise, we do not overrule that court unless an unmistakable question of law so mandates. Estate of Simmie v. CIR, 632 F.2d 93, 94 (9th Cir. 1980). B. Business Insurance premiums are deductible as "ordinary and necessary business expenses." 26 U.S.C. § 162(a). The......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT