Esurance Prop. & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Michigan Assigned Claims Plan
| Docket Number | 160592 |
| Decision Date | 26 July 2021 |
Plaintiff Esurance Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Esurance) paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to claimant, Roshaun Edwards (Edwards), pursuant to a no-fault automobile insurance policy, issued to another person, that was later declared void ab initio. Thereafter, Esurance filed this suit against defendants, the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan (MACP) and the Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility (MAIPF), seeking reimbursement under a theory of equitable...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
Mercurio v. Huntington Nat'l Bank
...the legal sufficiency of a plaintiff's claim as based on an examination of the factual allegations contained in the complaint. Esurance Prop, 507 Mich. at 508. A court may only consider the pleadings when rendering a decision under MCR 2.116(C)(8). Beaudrie v Henderson, 465 Mich. 124, 129; ......
-
Nichols v. Swindoll
... ... on May 3, 2006, asserting claims for negligence and under ... Ark. Code Ann. § ... Uncork & Create LLC v. Cincinnati Ins ... Co. , 27 F.4th 926, 930 (4th Cir. 2022) ... Doe v. Mich. State Univ. , 989 F.3d 418, 425 ... (6th Cir ... Coast Entm't of Durham, LLC v. Houston ... Cas. Co. , 31 F.4th 547, 550 (7th Cir. 2022) ... "We ... Esurance Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mich ... Assigned ms Plan , 968 N.W.2d 482, 487-88 ... (Mich. 2021) ... ...
-
Wilmore-Moody v. Zakir
...material fact exists. Id. [4–6] We also review de novo questions of statutory interpretation. Esurance Prop. & Gas. Ins. Co. v Mich. Assigned Claims Plan, 507 Mich. 498, 508, 968 N.W.2d 482 (2021). The key purpose of statutory interpretation is to "ascertain the legislative intent that may ......
-
Farrar v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Reg'l Transp.
...N.W.2d 482 (2021). "A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(8) tests the legal sufficiency of a claim based on the factual allegations in the complaint." Id. (quotation marks and citation omitted). "A motion MCR 2.116(C)(8) may only be granted when a claim is so clearly unenforceable that no factual de......
Get Started for Free