Evans v. Hughey

Decision Date31 January 1875
Citation1875 WL 8153,76 Ill. 115
PartiesWALKER EVANSv.RICHARD J. HUGHEY.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Moultrie county; the Hon. C. B. SMITH, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Hughey against Evans, to recover for services and commissions in making sale of certain real estate, under the following contract:

Richard J. Hughey, of the city of Mattoon, Coles county, Illinois, is hereby authorized to sell my farm, on which I live, situate and being in the county of Franklin, and State of Missouri. Said agent is authorized to sell said tract of land, containing 343 1/4 acres, at the price of $30 per acre, to be paid as follows: $3000 to be paid on the first of January, 1871, and the balance as follows: $3500 on the first of January, 1872, $3500 on the first day of January, 1873, and the remainder on the first day of January, 1874; all of which payments must bear ten per cent interest per annum from date of contract until paid. For making said sale, I agree to pay said Hughey the sum of $500, and in event that said agent succeeds in selling said land for more than $30 per acre, which he is hereby authorized to do, I agree and bind myself that said Hughey, as agent aforesaid, shall have whatever sum he may get over $30 per acre, as commission, in addition to the $500, and I bind myself to express in the deed, as the consideration, the whole amount for which said Hughey may sell said tract of land.

The first payment of $3000 must be secured by mortgage on real estate worth at least $6000 cash.

Witness my signature, this 27th day of December, 1869.

WALKER EVANS.”

On January 1, 1870, Hughey effected a sale of the farm to John B. Rigney and Hugh J. Rigney, of Moultrie county, Illinois, at the price of $35 per acre, amounting to the sum of $12,015.75, to be paid as follows: $3000 Jan. 1, 1871; $3500 Jan. 1, 1872; $3500 Jan. 1, 1873, and $2015.75 Jan. 1, 1874, for which sums the Rigneys executed their promissory notes, payable to Evans, with ten per cent interest, the Rigneys agreeing to execute to Evans a mortgage on their farm in Moultrie county, Illinois, of 320 acres, to secure the payment of the first note of $3000. Afterward, Evans came to Mattoon, in this State, where Hughey resided, bringing with him a trust deed for the Rigneys to execute on the land in Moultrie county. Hughey represented to Evans that the Rigneys would not execute a trust deed, but would execute a mortgage, which Evans agreed to accept, and left for his home in Missouri, leaving it with Hughey to get the mortgage executed, and to have included in it also another note for $2500, which the Rigneys had given to Evans for stock and farming implements purchased from the latter.

Hughey subsequently procured the mortgage to be executed by the Rigneys, to secure the payment of both notes for $3000 and $2500, and handed the same to a neighbor, who was going to Sullivan, to take to the recorder's office. About a year afterward, this neighbor returned the mortgage to Hughey, saying he had forgotten to give it to the recorder, and Hughey then immediately sent the mortgage to the recorder's office to be recorded. The mortgage was executed January 31, 1870, and recorded February 14, 1871. Between these dates, certain judgments were obtained against the mortgagors, and became prior liens upon the land, amounting to $1179.50. Default was made in paying the notes secured by the mortgage, and Evans caused the mortgage to be foreclosed, bought in the land himself under the foreclosure sale, the time for redemption expired, and he obtained a deed for the land. After...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Thomas Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 10 March 1902
    ...the statute.' Robison v. Hibbs, 48 Ill. 408, 409, 410; Hawks v. Lands, 8 Ill. 227, 232; Hubbard v. Rogers, 64 Ill. 434, 437; Evans v. Hughey, 76 Ill. 115, 120; Clause v. Bullock Printing Press Co. 118 Ill. 612, 617, 9 N. E. 201; Dushane v. Benedict, 120 U. S. 630, 648, 30 L. ed. 810, 814, 7......
  • Donnelly v. Thieben
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31 October 1881
    ...Page, 1 Hilt. 332; Mayor v. Parker, Vein S. S. Co. 21 How. Pr. 289; Slayback v. Jones, 9 Ind. 470; Hubbard v. Rogers, 64 Ill. 434; Evans v. Hughey, 76 Ill. 115; Waterman v. Clark, 76 Ill. 428. Mr. JOHN LYLE KING, for defendant in error; as to defendant's right to recover, cited Cummings v. ......
  • Chicago Legal News Co. v. Browne
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31 October 1879
    ...Hawks v. Lands, 3 Gilm. 227; Deforrest v. Order, 42 Ill. 500; Robeson v. Hibbs, 48 Ill. 408; Hubbard v. Rogers, 64 Ill. 434; Evans v. Hughey, 76 Ill. 115; Waterman v. Clark, 76 Ill. 428. Defendant is not entitled to recover exemplary damages: Miller v. Kirby, 74 Ill. 243; Cutter v. Smith, 5......
  • Hartshorn v. Kinsman
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31 May 1885
    ...Waterman v. Clark, 76 Ill. 430; Hawks v. Lands, 3 Gil. 232; Sargeant v. Kellogg et al., 5 Gil. 280; Bush v. Kindred, 20 Ill. 95; Evans v. Hughey, 76 Ill. 115.WELCH, J. On 8th day of January, 1884, appellants sued appellee before a justice of the peace, upon a promissory note and account. Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT