Evans v. Roberson

Decision Date03 January 1933
Docket Number31196
Citation176 La. 280,145 So. 539
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court
PartiesEVANS v. ROBERSON et al

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; William H Byrnes, Jr., Judge.

Suit by Mrs. Lucille Payne Evans, for the benefit of her minor children, against Mrs. Francis K. Roberson and another. From a judgment dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

S. J Tennant, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellant.

J. C Henriques, Sr., and J. C. Henriques, Jr., both of New Orleans, for appellee.

OPINION

LAND, J.

Mrs. Lucille Payne Evans has brought the present suit against Mrs. Francis K. Roberson and Vernon G. Roberson, the heirs and legatees of William E. Roberson, deceased, to have plaintiffs three minor children, in necessitous circumstances, recognized to be the illegitimate children of decedent, and as such entitled to alimony at the rate of $ 50 each per month for such period of time as the court may deem fit and proper.

Plaintiff alleges that her three minor children, Yvonne Evans Roberson, William Evans Roberson, and Alphonesine May Evans Roberson, were born March 17, 1924, July, 28, 1925, and October 19, 1927, respectively; that the father of these children, one William E. Roberson, was married at the time they were born; and that, while it was impossible for him to acknowledge them as his natural children, he did admit and declare that they were his offspring.

The following admissions are made by counsel for plaintiff and defendant:

"1. It is admitted that the plaintiff, Mrs. Lucille Payne Evans, mother of the children for whom alimony is sought in this petition, was married to Ralph W. Evans in September, 1921.

"2. It is further admitted that said Lucille Payne Evans and Ralph W. Evans have never been divorced or separated by a judgment of court; that said Ralph W. Evans is still alive; and, if put on the witness stand, would testify that he has resided in the City of New Orleans during the past six months.

"3. That the plaintiff, Lucille Payne Evans, and said children for whom alimony is claimed in this suit have resided in the City of New Orleans for the past six months.

"4. It is further admitted that these admissions are to be considered by the court as amending the petition filed by plaintiff herein." Tr. p. 9.

Mrs. Francis K. Roberson, the widow of William E. Roberson, deceased, excepted to plaintiff's petition on the ground that same disclosed no cause or right of action. From a judgment maintaining this exception and dismissing plaintiff's suit, she has appealed to this court.

Accepting the well-pleaded facts set forth in plaintiff's petition as true, for the purpose of disposing of the exception of no cause or right of action, it appears that the three children of plaintiff were born during the lifetime of her husband, Ralph W. Evans; that plaintiff has never been divorced or separated from him by a judgment of court; that plaintiff's husband was still alive at the date of the institution of the present suit; and that plaintiff, her three children, and her husband have resided in the city of New Orleans for six months before the present suit was brought.

In our opinion, the exception of no cause or right of action was properly maintained.

Article 184 of the Civil Code declares that: "The law considers the husband of the mother as the father of all children conceived during the marriage."

After providing in the articles that follow the specific instances in which the husband may disavow the paternity of the child it is declared in article 191 of the Code that: "In all the cases above enumerated, where the presumption of paternity ceases, the father, if he intends to dispute the legitimacy of the child, must do it within one month, if he be in the place where the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, A
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 27, 1955
    ...v. Hale, 64 Kan. 367, 67 P. 848 (Sup.Ct.1902); Copenhaver v. Hemphill, 314 Ky. 356, 235 S.W.2d 778 (Ct.App.1951); Evans v. Roberson, 176 La. 280, 145 So. 539 (Sup.Ct.1933); Hubert v. Cloutier, 135 Me. 230, 194 A. 303 (Sup.Jud.Ct.1937); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25, 109 A.2d 760 (Ct.App.1954......
  • Murphy v. Houma Well Service
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 18, 1969
    ...action to disavow, the right to challenge the legitimacy of the children born during marriage becomes extinct. E. g., Evans v. Roberson, 1933, 176 La. 280, 145 So. 539. Likewise, a Louisiana Court of Appeal has stated, "* * * as against heirs of a deceased, where no action to disavow patern......
  • Gallo v. Gallo
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 3, 2003
    ...becomes extinct, precluding a mother from establishing her child as the illegitimate offspring of another man. Evans v. Roberson 176 La. 280, 284,145 So. 539, 541 (1933). Accordingly, we hold sua sponte12 that Mr. Gallo's right to rebut the LSA-C.C. art. 184 presumption of paternity was per......
  • State v. Randall
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1951
    ... ... 773; Kuhlman v. Kuhlman, 137 La. 263, 68 So. 604; Succession of Flynn, 161 La. 707, 109 So. 395; Beard v. Vincent, 174 La. 869, 141 So. 862; Evans v. Roberson, 176 La. 280, 145 So. 539; Smith v. Smith, 214 La. 881, 39 So.2d 162 ...         The state gives recognition to the discussed ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT