Evans v. State, 3D98-2508.
| Decision Date | 14 June 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D98-2508.,3D98-2508. |
| Citation | 758 So.2d 1282 |
| Parties | Deangelo Andre EVANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GODERICH, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.
The defendant, DeAngelo Andre Evans, appeals his convictions for two counts of armed robbery with a firearm and one count of attempted armed robbery with a firearm. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.
At trial, a police officer testified that the "gun" used during the alleged robbery and attempted robbery was a starter pistol. He further testified that when he test-fired the starter pistol, it made a loud "pop." The State did not present any evidence that the starter gun expelled a projectile when it was test-fired or that the starter pistol could readily be converted to expel a projectile.
At the close of the State's case, the defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal arguing that the State had failed to prove that the defendant used a firearm during the alleged robbery. Specifically, the defense argued: "What we have here is a starter pistol with absolutely no testimony from anyone that it's capable of expelling an object, which is what must be done so it can be considered a firearm." The trial court denied the defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of two counts of armed robbery with a firearm and one count of attempted armed robbery with a firearm.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We agree.
Section 790.001(6), Florida Statutes (1997), defines "firearm" as "any weapon (including a starter gun) which will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; the frame or receiver of any such weapon; any device; or any machine gun...." A starter pistol is not designed to expel a projectile. Thayer v. State, 609 So.2d 150, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992),review denied, 618 So.2d 211 (Fla.1993); Charley v. State, 590 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). As such, the State has the burden of proving that "the starter gun could either expel a projectile, or be readily converted to do so." Charley, 590 So.2d at 6.
The only evidence that the State presented on the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jackson v. Clarke
...1981). Others have held that such evidence is not sufficient to support a conviction for felon-in-possession. E.g., Evans v. State, 758 So. 2d 1282 (Fl. Dist. Ct. App. 2000); Commonwealth v. Rhodes, 489 N.E.2d 216 (Mass. App. Ct. 1986). Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Virginia's habeas de......
-
Wilson v. State
...defendant's bb gun was a deadly weapon). The state had the burden of proving that the cap gun constituted a weapon. See Evans v. State, 758 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Appellant's motion was facially sufficient in alleging that reasonably competent counsel should have raised the issue th......
-
Akins v. State
...cutting off the end so it's shorter. That's what I believe it was. To be for sure, I'm not definite. Akins argues that Evans v. State, 758 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and Stanley v. State, 757 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), support his argument that his conviction should be reversed. We......
-
Johnson v. State, 4D03-776.
...basis for the imposition of his minimum mandatory sentence. See State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379, 1381 (Fla.1998); Evans v. State, 758 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). FARMER, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., ...