Evans v. Williams, 41144
Decision Date | 22 April 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 3,No. 41144,41144,3 |
Citation | Evans v. Williams, 142 S.E.2d 424, 111 Ga.App. 647 (Ga. App. 1965) |
Parties | Nathan EVANS et al. v. H. E. WILLIAMS |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Henry A. Stewart, Sr., Cedartown, for plaintiff in error.
Wayne W. Gammon, Cedartown, for defendants in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The plaintiff in this case sustained serious personal injuries while he was riding as a guest passenger in an automobile of the defendantNathan Evans being driven by the defendantMrs. Nathan Evans as a family purpose car.It appeared from the evidence that Mrs. Evans immediately prior to the collision had been operating the automobile in a careful and prudent manner, and that she suddenly and without warning drove it to her left across the shoulder of the highway, and, without applying the brakes or taking any other corrective action, struck a large tree standing nine feet from the edge of the highway causing the plaintiff to be thrown forward against the instrument panel, thereby inflicting the injuries sued for.The exceptions here are to the overruling of the defendants' motion for a new trial on the general grounds and motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict for the plaintiff.The plaintiffs in error contend that the verdict for the plaintiff was not authorized because the evidence did not show gross negligence on the part of the defendant driver and affirmatively showed that the plaintiff had failed to exercise ordinary care for his own safety.This contention is wholly without merit because there was no evidence to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Evans
...results on appeal are out of proportion to the chances of favorable results. The basis of the insurer's refusal to settle after the original verdict and its determination, over the objection of its insured, to appeal the case, (
Evans v. Williams, supra) to this court was that the evidence showed as a matter of law, (1) that the defendant driver was not guilty of gross negligence, and, (2) that the guest had assumed the risk of riding with her. We do not think either of these defensesappeal, the offer was declined. On appeal this court held that on the questions of gross negligence and of whether the plaintiff was in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety, the verdict had been authorized. Evans v. Williams, 111 Ga.App. 647, 142 S.E.2d 424. The matter of assumption of risk on the part of the plaintiff in getting into the car and occupying a position where he could neither assist or control his pupil's actions in handling it (whether on the outside ofowner's wife, the driver of the automobile. The jury returned a verdict for $25,000 against both defendants. This court affirmed the trial court's overruling of a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Evans v. Williams, 111 Ga.App. 647, 142 S.E.2d 424. The owner of the automobile then brought suit against his insurer and its adjuster, alleging that he had a liability unsurance policy with the insurer in the amount of $10,000 and that the refusal of the defendants to accept...