Evett v. State
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
| Citation | Evett v. State, 29 Ala.App. 370, 196 So. 170 (Ala. App. 1940) |
| Decision Date | 14 May 1940 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 985. |
| Parties | EVETT v. STATE. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.
Wheeler Evett was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
H. T Foster, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
Thos S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and John W. Vardaman, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.
It now appears that by the return to the writ of certiorari ordered in this case the corrected transcript shows an indictment in regular form against appellant. And that the proceedings leading to his conviction were in all respects conducted in the form prescribed by law.
It further affirmatively appears that he was convicted and sentenced on September 15, 1938; that his counsel filed a motion to set aside the verdict of the jury, and the judgment rendered thereon, on September 29, 1938; but that said motion was not noticed by the court until December 19, 1938, upon which date an order was entered continuing the motion to March 13, 1939. And that upon this latter date an order was made continuing said motion to September 11, 1939 when it was overruled and denied--defendant excepting.
It thus affirmatively appears that on December 19, 1938, when the purported order to continue said motion to March 13 1939--and thence on to September 11, 1939, when it was overruled--was made, the court had lost all power over said motion; and the said "order" was null, void, and of no effect. Code 1923, Sec. 6670. This is true because the Code section cited requires that in order for the trial court to retain jurisdiction over the judgment entered on September 15, 1938 beyond thirty days after that date, a motion for a new trial must not only be filed within that time--as was done in this case--but said motion must within that time be "called to the attention of the court and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Rivers v. State, 1 Div. 875
...Central of Georgia Railway Company v. McDaniel, 262 Ala. 227, 78 So.2d 290; Pate v. State, 244 Ala. 396, 14 So.2d 251; Evett v. State, 29 Ala.App. 370, 196 So. 170. There being no valid ruling on the motion for a new trial, the time for filing the transcript of the evidence must be computed......
-
Nickens v. State, 8 Div. 334.
...688. The bill of exceptions in this case must be stricken upon the motion filed by appellee. The cases of Patton v. State, supra, and Evett v. State, supra, are direct authority this conclusion and holding. As we gather from the record, and briefs in behalf of appellant, the principal insis......
-
Hospital Service Corp. v. Clifton
... ... 356 HOSPITAL SERVICE CORPORATION v. CLIFTON. 4 Div. 544.Court of Appeals of AlabamaMay 14, 1940 ... ...