Ewert v. Taylor
| Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | WHITING, J. |
| Citation | Ewert v. Taylor, 38 S. D. 124, 160 N. W. 797 (S.D. 1916) |
| Decision Date | 30 December 1916 |
| Docket Number | 4066,4067. [*] |
| Parties | EWERT, State Treasurer, v. TAYLOR et al. (two cases). |
Appeals from Circuit Court, Hughes County; John F. Hughes, Judge.
Proceeding to enforce a tax levy by Adolph W. Ewert, as Treasurer of the State of South Dakota, against George C. Taylor, individually and as president of the American Express Company, and the American Express Company. From a judgment canceling a tax levy and reassessing defendant's property, and from the order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals, and from that part of the judgment making a new assessment, and from the order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed, with directions to dismiss.
Bailey & Voorhees, of Sioux Falls (Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Clarence C. Caldwell, Atty. Gen., and Byron S. Payne, Asst. Atty Gen., for respondent.
Plaintiff suing in his official capacity, seeks to recover the sum of $11,711.28-taxes levied for the year 1914 upon the property of defendant company. Hereinafter whenever we use the term "defendant" it shall be understood as referring to defendant company only. The trial court entered a judgment canceling such tax levy and the assessment upon which it was based, reassessing defendant's property at about 40 per cent. of the previous assessment, levying a tax of $4,450, and adjudging that defendant pay such $4,450. Both parties appealed-plaintiff from the whole judgment and from the order denying a new trial, defendant from that part of the judgment making a new assessment and levy and adjudging the payment of the $4,450, and from the order denying a new trial.
The assessment and levy, which were made the basis of this action, were made by the state Tax Commission. Its authority, if any there be, is to be found in article 11, § 2, of the state Constitution, and in chapter 64, Laws 1907, re-enacted by chapter 347, Laws 1913-hereinafter spoken of as "chapter 64." Article 11, § 2, of the Constitution reads as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Laclede Power & Light Co. v. City of St. Louis
... ... therefore, constitute unjust discrimination. Shipp, etc., ... v. Cummings, 14 S.W.2d 747, 158 Tenn. 526; Ewert v ... Taylor, 160 N.W. 797, 38 S.D. 124. (8) The City has no ... power to exempt any person from the payment of any tax ... Charter of City of ... ...