Ewing v. Cumberland Cnty., Civil No. 09–5432 (JBS/AMD).
Court | United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey |
Writing for the Court | SIMANDLE, Chief Judge |
Citation | 152 F.Supp.3d 269 |
Parties | Michael Alan EWING, Plaintiff, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, Cumberland County Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Dale Sciore, Sergeant Clint Ciangaglini, Sergeant Brad Pierce, Correctional Officer Edwin Pratts, The Estate of Correctional Officer Kevin Still, Correctional Officer Joshua L. Minguela, Correctional Officer Drew Ford, Correctional Officer John Fazzolari, Vineland Township, Vineland Police Department, Police Officer James Day, Police Officer Steven Houbary, Defendants. |
Docket Number | Civil No. 09–5432 (JBS/AMD). |
Decision Date | 25 March 2015 |
152 F.Supp.3d 269
Michael Alan EWING, Plaintiff,
v.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, Cumberland County Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Dale Sciore, Sergeant Clint Ciangaglini, Sergeant Brad Pierce, Correctional Officer Edwin Pratts, The Estate of Correctional Officer Kevin Still, Correctional Officer Joshua L. Minguela, Correctional Officer Drew Ford, Correctional Officer John Fazzolari, Vineland Township, Vineland Police Department, Police Officer James Day, Police Officer Steven Houbary, Defendants.
Civil No. 09–5432 (JBS/AMD).
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
Signed March 25, 2015.
Martin P. Duffy, Esq., Cozen and O'Connor, Liberty View Bldg., Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiff Michael Alan Ewing.
John C. Eastlack, Jr., Esq., Daniel Edward Rybeck, Esq., Weir & Partners LLP, Cherry Hill, NJ, for Defendants Cumberland County and Cumberland County Department of Corrections.
Arnold Robinson, Esq., Robinson & Andujar, LLC, Millville, NJ, for Defendants Dale Sciore and Brad Pierce.
Shanna McCann, Esq., Chance & McCann LLC, Woodstown, NJ, for Defendant Clint Ciangaglini.
Linda A. Galella, Esq., Richardson, Galella & Austermuhl, Woodbury, NJ, for Defendant Edwin Pratts.
Michael Louis Testa, Sr., Esq., Justin Robert White, Esq., Testa Heck Scrocca & Testa, PA, Vineland, NJ, for Defendant Estate of Kevin Still.
Salvatore J. Siciliano, Esq., Siciliano & Associates, LLC, Haddonfield, NJ, for Defendant Joshua Minguela.
Patrick J. Madden, Esq., Timothy R. Bieg, Esq., Madden & Madden, PA, Haddonfield, NJ, for Defendant Drew Ford.
Douglas E. Burry, Esq., Saponaro & Sitzler, The Newbold House, Mt. Holly, NJ, for Defendant John Fazzolari.
Judson B. Barrett, Esq., Barrett and Pavluk, LLC, Ocean, NJ, for Defendants Vineland Township, Vineland Police Department, James Day, and Steven Houbary.
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge:
Table of Contents |
---|
I. | INTRODUCTION | 277 |
II. | BACKGROUND | 277 |
A. | Factual Background | 277 |
1. | Arrest and Transport to Vineland Police Department and Cumberland County Jail | 277 | ||
2. | Incident in the Processing room during Plaintiff's first trip to the CCDOC (Day, Ciangaglini, Minguela) | 278 | ||
3. | Incident in the CCDOC control room and strip search room during Plaintiff's second visit (Houbary, Pratts, Still, Fazzolari, Sciore, Pierce, Minguela, Ford) | 279 | ||
4. | Use of Force reports | 281 | ||
5. | Defendants' Statements | 281 | ||
6. | Plaintiff's injuries | 282 | ||
7. | Expert reports of Dr. Fred Simon and Dr. Randall McCauley | 283 | ||
8. | Training on the use of force at Cumberland County Jail | 283 | ||
9. | Internal investigations into excessive force at Cumberland County Jail | 285 | ||
10. | Plaintiff's expert report of Dr. Randall McCauley | 285 | ||
11. | Notice of Claim | 286 |
B. | Procedural Background | 286 |
III. | STANDARD OF REVIEW | 287 |
IV. | ANALYSIS | 288 |
A. | Claims against Cumberland Correctional Officers | 288 |
1. | Summary judgment is not warranted against Plaintiff's § 1983 claim of excessive force | 289 | ||
2. | Minguela is not entitled to qualified immunity | 295 | ||
3. | Plaintiff's state law claims are not barred by the NJTCA | 296 | ||
4. | Defendants Pratts, Still, Minguela, Ford, Fazzolari, and Ciangaglini are not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's assault and battery claim | 299 | ||
5. | Fazzolari and Pratts are not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress | 300 | ||
6. | Defendants Pratts, Still, Minguela, Ford, Fazzolari, and Pierce are not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's conspiracy claim | 300 |
B. | Claims against Cumberland County and CCDOC | 302 |
1. | Cumberland County is not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's failure to train and failure to investigate claims | 303 | ||
2. | Plaintiff's common law claims are not precluded by the New Jersey Tort Claims Act | 306 |
C. | Claims against the Vineland Defendants | 307 |
1. | The City of Vineland is entitled to summary judgment on the § 1983 claim of failure to train and the common law claim of negligent training | 307 | ||
2. | The Court will grant summary judgment on Plaintiff's § 1983 claim for failure to intervene against Officer Day but deny summary judgment on the claim against Officer Houbary | 309 |
IV. | CONCLUSION | 311 |
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a case involving excessive force against Plaintiff Michael Ewing by correctional officers at the Cumberland County Correctional Facility and police officers of the Vineland Police Department. After Ewing was arrested in Vineland, New Jersey for disorderly conduct, he was processed and sent to the Cumberland County Jail, where he was beaten by correctional officers. He suffered multiple traumatic injuries, fractures, and a concussion.
Plaintiff brought suit against the individual officers involved, as well as against Cumberland County, the Cumberland County Jail, Vineland Township (“City of Vineland” or “Vineland”),1 and the Vineland Police Department, alleging constitutional violations under the Fourteenth Amendment and various state tort claims.
The individual officers and entity Defendants have filed nine motions for summary judgment seeking the dismissal of Plaintiff's § 1983 and state law claims. Because there is a genuine dispute as to whether Cumberland County correctional officers used excessive force against Plaintiff and whether the jail failed to adequately investigate and train officers in the use of force, the Court will deny the Cumberland County Defendants' motions for summary judgment. The Court will, however, grant the Vineland Defendants' motion for summary judgment for all Vineland Defendants except Steven Houbary, and will dismiss the City of Vineland (named as Vineland Township), the Vineland Police Department, and Vineland Police Officer James Day from this action.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Because Plaintiff suffers from memory problems allegedly related to post-traumatic stress and recalls very little of what happened to him, the following facts are taken primarily from other sources in the record.
1. Arrest and transport to Vineland Police Department and Cumberland County Jail
At around 11 p.m. on the evening of June 30, 2008, the Vineland police arrived at a Comfort Inn in Vineland, New Jersey, where Plaintiff was staying, in response to a disorderly persons call. Plaintiff, who was in the area because of a temporary job, had gotten into an argument with the clerk of the hotel, which prompted the clerk to call the police. The clerk refused to let Plaintiff into his room, so Plaintiff went to sleep near some trees behind the hotel. (Pl. Counterstatement of Facts (“Counter SMF”) [Docket Item 237] ¶¶ 6–11.)
Police Officer William Bontcue of the Vineland Police Department arrived at the scene and was told that Plaintiff was in the back of the hotel. (Bontcue Dep. 1 [Docket Item 237–4] 93:20–94:13.) According to Bontcue, Plaintiff was lying on the ground but was not acting disorderly. (Id. 94:17–96:2.) Bontcue called to Plaintiff, who then got up and became “quite agitated.” When Bontcue could not get him to calm down, Bontcue told Plaintiff that he was under arrest for disorderly conduct. (Bontcue Dep. 2 [Docket Item 221–8] 48:2–51:24.) After Plaintiff pushed Bontcue into a parked van, Bontcue released his police dog from his car. Bontcue and the
dog pushed Plaintiff to the ground and another police officer who had arrived on the scene, Officer Michael Fransko, handcuffed Plaintiff. (Bontcue Dep. 252:20–55:12.) Plaintiff was bitten by the police dog and was pepper sprayed during this encounter. (Minguela Statement of Material Facts (“Minguela SMF”) [Docket Item 221–1] ¶¶ 12–13.)
Plaintiff was taken to the Vineland Police Department for processing, where he was pepper sprayed a second time for spitting at police officers. (Shaw Dep. [Docket Item 221–8] 20:24–21:5; Minguela SMF ¶ 16.) He was then taken to the hospital to be cleared for dog bites. As he was being secured into a stretcher by Defendant Officer James Day and Officer Shaw to go to the hospital, Plaintiff spit in Shaw's face. Shaw then struck Plaintiff with his hand, and Plaintiff fell off the stretcher and onto the pavement. Plaintiff sustained a cut over his left eye. (Shaw Dep. 66:12–25; Minguela SMF ¶¶ 17–18; Counter SMF ¶¶ 22–23.)
At the hospital, Plaintiff was given two sedatives and cleared for transport to the Cumberland County Correctional Facility (“CCDOC” or “Cumberland County Jail”), where he was to be held. Correctional officers at the Cumberland County Jail were told that Plaintiff was coming and that he was “belligerent” and “irate” and was “trying to fight with officers.” (Pratts Dep. [Docket Item 237–8] 157:17–23; Still Dep. [Docket Item 237–10] 214:4–23.)
Day transported Plaintiff to the CCDOC. He stated that it was the practice of the Vineland Police Department to assign the most junior police officer to transport prisoners to the jail. He had transported prisoners to jail before but had received no formal training on the proper procedures for bringing a prisoner to jail. He learned the procedures during his time shadowing another officer following his graduation from the police academy. (Day Dep. 34:18–35:22; 114:10–115:25.)
2. Incident in the processing room during Plaintiff's first trip to the CCDOC (Day, Ciangaglini, Minguela)
Defendant Day brought Plaintiff to a CCDOC processing cell. Defendants Sergeant Clint Ciangaglini and correctional officer Lisa–Brown Carter were in the room. Defendant Joshua Minguela observed from an outside monitor. Day testified that Plaintiff appeared sedated and calm, and was having some difficulty standing because of the sedatives. (Day Dep. [Docket Item 237–6] 134:1–135:7; CCDOC Video.) Minguela stated that Plaintiff was “acting in an irate manner.” (Minguela Use of Force report [Docket Item 237–13].) Nurse Moore, who was called into the processing cell to examine Plaintiff, did not observe any injuries to Mr. Ewing other than to his left eye. (See Deposition of Moore at page 17, lines 15–25, attached as Exhibit “N”).
Nurse Moore refused to accept Plaintiff into the jail...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Panarello v. City of Vineland, Civil. No. 12-4165 (RBK/JS)
...does not apply.” Hoag v. Brown , 397 N.J.Super. 34, 54, 935 A.2d 1218 (2007) (citations omitted); see also Ewing v. Cumberland Cty. , 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 305–06, Civ. No. 09–5432 (JBS/AMD), 2015 WL 1384374, at *29 (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2015). Plaintiffs offer no meaningful response to this argu......
-
Williams v. Verizon N.J., Inc., Civ. No. 2:19-09350 (KM-SCM)
...the conspiracy itself but the underlying wrong which, absent the conspiracy, would give a right of action." Ewing v. Cumberland Cnty., 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 301 (D.N.J. 2015). Here, the agreement to commit some underlying tort is not alleged with any specificity, and at least one potential t......
-
Lankford v. City of Clifton Police Dep't, Civ. No. 18-6643 (KM)(CLW)
...the amount of force they used, contrary to objective evidence in the record that they had given the plaintiff a severe beating. 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 301 (D.N.J. 2015). But the Ewing court found other corroborating evidence, such as the testimony of a nurse in the correctional facility that ......
-
Lankford v. City of Clifton Police Dep't, Civ. No. 18-6643 (KM)(CLW)
...the amount of force they used, contrary to objective evidence in the record that they had given the plaintiff a severe beating. 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 301 (D.N.J. 2015). But the Ewing court found other corroborating evidence, such as the testimony of a nurse in the correctional facility that ......
-
Panarello v. City of Vineland, Civil. No. 12-4165 (RBK/JS)
...does not apply.” Hoag v. Brown , 397 N.J.Super. 34, 54, 935 A.2d 1218 (2007) (citations omitted); see also Ewing v. Cumberland Cty. , 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 305–06, Civ. No. 09–5432 (JBS/AMD), 2015 WL 1384374, at *29 (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2015). Plaintiffs offer no meaningful response to this argu......
-
Williams v. Verizon N.J., Inc., Civ. No. 2:19-09350 (KM-SCM)
...the conspiracy itself but the underlying wrong which, absent the conspiracy, would give a right of action." Ewing v. Cumberland Cnty., 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 301 (D.N.J. 2015). Here, the agreement to commit some underlying tort is not alleged with any specificity, and at least one potential t......
-
Lankford v. City of Clifton Police Dep't, Civ. No. 18-6643 (KM)(CLW)
...the amount of force they used, contrary to objective evidence in the record that they had given the plaintiff a severe beating. 152 F. Supp. 3d 269, 301 (D.N.J. 2015). But the Ewing court found other corroborating evidence, such as the testimony of a nurse in the correctional facility that ......
-
Doe v. Small, 1:21-cv-11189
...(quoting White v. City of Vineland, Civ. A. No. 11608308, 2020 WL 6638579, at *6 (D.N.J. Nov. 12, 2020))); Ewing v. Cumberland Cnty., 152 F.Supp.3d 269, 294 (D.N.J. 2015) (finding that police officers who were in the room for and failed to stop an allegedly unlawful strip search “could like......
-
Part two: case summaries by major topic.
...State Board of Correction, Idaho State Correctional Institution) U.S. District Court FAILURE TO INTERVENE Ewingv. Cumberland County, 152 F.Supp.3d 269 (D. N.J. 2015). A former arrestee brought a [section] 1983 action, bringing claims against county correctional officers, police officers, an......
-
Part two: case summaries by major topic.
...Criminal Justice Center Oklahoma) U.S. District Court OFFICER ON PRISONER ASSAULT FAILURE TO INTERVENE Ewing v. Cumberland County, 152 F.Supp.3d 269 (D. N.J. 2015). A former arrestee brought a [section] 1983 action, bringing claims against county correctional officers, police officers, and ......
-
Part one: complete case summaries in alphabetical order.
...to Intervene PRETRIAL DETENTION: Use of Force TRAINING: Failure to Train USE OF FORCE: Excessive Force Ewing v. Cumberland County, 152 F.Supp.3d 269 (D. N.J. 2015). A former arrestee brought a [section] 1983 action, bringing claims against county correctional officers, police officers, and ......