Ex parte Arrington, 4 Div. 596

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
Writing for the CourtGARDNER, J.
Citation70 So. 1012,195 Ala. 694
Docket Number4 Div. 596
Decision Date16 December 1915
PartiesEx parte ARRINGTON.

70 So. 1012

195 Ala. 694

Ex parte ARRINGTON.

4 Div. 596

Supreme Court of Alabama

December 16, 1915


Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

H.L. Martin, of Ozark, for petitioner.

W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

GARDNER, J.

Petition by James Arrington for certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the case of James Arrington v. State, 69 So. 385. Writ denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Barefield v. State, 4 Div. 411
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1916
    ...from one person to another. Bush v. State, 12 Ala.App. 260, 67 So. 847; Arrington v. State, 69 So. 385, affirmed by Supreme Court 70 So. 1012. In such cases, it is permissible for the prosecution to offer evidence of several distinct sales by the defendant as tending to support the charge o......
  • Whitehead v. State, 6 Div. 335
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 1918
    ...a different rule; Darrington v. State, 162 Ala. 60, 50 So. 396; Arrington v. State, 13 Ala. App. 359, 69 So. 385; Ex parte Arrington, 195 Ala. 694, 70 So. 1012. The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Resolving doubtful intendments arising from the averments in the pleas of......
  • Howard v. State, 6 Div. 79
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1916
    ...by the statute and was not subject to the demurrers. Arrington v. State, 69 So. 385, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Ex parte Arrington, 70 So. 1012; Bush v. State, 67 So. 847; Harrison v. State, 69 So. 383; Whaley v. State, 69 So. 384. The fourth count follows the language of section 12 o......
  • Bridgeforth v. State, 8 Div. 380
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • July 10, 1916
    ...to another." Acts 1909, Spec.Sess. p. 91, § 31; Arrington v. State, 13 Ala.App. 359, 69 So. 385, affirmed by the Supreme Court, 70 So. 1012; Bush v. State, 12 Ala.App. 260, 67 So. 847; Burt v. State, 72 So. 266. That the Legislature has the power to prescribe the form of indictment and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT