Ex parte Atwell
| Citation | 354 So.2d 39 |
| Decision Date | 27 January 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-177,77-177 |
| Parties | Ex parte Herbert Kenneth ATWELL. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
To continue reading
Request your trial
47 cases
-
Carpenter v. State
...opinion. As to that additional issue, we need only cite Atwell v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 354 So.2d 30, 37 (1977), cert. denied, Ala., 354 So.2d 39 (1978), for the following "After a case has been submitted to the jury, their deliberations in the jury room are not subject to review. Gamble, McE......
-
Dearman v. State
...legal determination of competency is reached. See, e.g., Atwell v. State, 354 So.2d 30, 35 (Ala. Crim .App. 1977), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 39 (Ala. 1978). In other words, in such situations, the trial court must inquire into the defendant's competency, generally by conducting a competency h......
-
Magwood v. Smith
...well as factual understanding of the proceeding against him." Atwell v. State, 354 So.2d 30, 35 (Ala.Crim.App.1977), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 39 (Ala.1978). See also Holland v. State, 376 So.2d 796 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 802 (Ala.1979). Cf. Gray v. Lucas, 710 F.2d 1048, 105......
-
Thompson v. State, 6 Div. 799
...are irrelevant, or are harassing, annoying, or humiliating." Atwell v. State, 354 So.2d 30, 39 (Ala.Crim.App.1977), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 39 (Ala.1978); Tombrello v. State, 421 So.2d 1319 (Ala. "The trial judge is vested with discretion in the conduct of a trial, and the appellate courts ......
Request a trial to view additional results