Ex parte Barger
| Decision Date | 20 April 1990 |
| Citation | 562 So.2d 656 |
| Parties | Ex parte David Wayne BARGER. (Re David W. Barger v. State). 89-888. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals (6 Div. 158). Appeal from the Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County, No. CC-85-252, Thomas S. Wilson, J. Ricky J. McKinney, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 562 So.2d 650.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
In denying the petition for writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).
WRIT DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Grimsley v. State
...cannot be raised or considered for the first time on appeal." Barger v. State, 562 So.2d 650, 656 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 562 So.2d 656 (Ala.1990). XVII The appellant further contends that the trial court erred in allowing two knives to be received into evidence at trial. Once agai......
-
Jenkins v. State
...of this case, the court's instruction was sufficient. See also Barger v. State, 562 So.2d 650 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 562 So.2d 656 (1990); Garnett v. State, 555 So.2d 1153 (Ala.Cr.App.1989); Soriano v. State, 527 So.2d 1367 (Ala.Cr.App.1988); Chillous v. State, 405 So.2d 58 (Ala.C......
-
Dyson v. State
...v. United States, 293 F.2d 445 (5th Cir.1961).' " ' " Barger v. State, 562 So.2d 650, 652 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), writ denied, Ex parte Barger, 562 So.2d 656 (Ala.1990). As the evidence presented by the State was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict, the appellant's argument as to this issue......
-
Rowell v. State
...contradictions in evidence "raise questions of weight, not sufficiency, and present credibility issues for the jury"), cert. denied, 562 So.2d 656 (Ala.1990). See also Waddle v. State, 473 So.2d 580, 582 (Ala.Cr.App.1985) ("where there is a conflict in the evidence, the inferences to be dra......
Request a trial to view additional results