Ex parte Brantley
| Citation | 66 So. 1008,191 Ala. 660 |
| Decision Date | 25 July 1914 |
| Docket Number | 828 |
| Parties | Ex parte BRANTLEY. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Barnett & Bugg, of Monroeville, and Frank S. Stone, of Bay Minette, for petitioner.
R.C. Brickell, Atty. Gen., and T.H. Seay, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Petition by Charley Brantley for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review the decision and judgment of that court in the case of Charley Brantley v. State, wherein the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. Petition denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Loraine Brasseau v. Edward Padlo
... ... the parties. State v. Brunette, 28 N.D ... 539, 150 N.W. 271, Ann Cas 1916E, 340; Brantley v ... State, 11 Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678 (certiorari ... denied 191 Ala. 660, 66 So. 1008) ... The ... fact of such ... ...
-
Brasseau v. Padlo., 302.
...Brunette, 28 N.D. 539, 150 N.W. 271, Ann.Cas.1916E, 340; Brantley v. State, 11 Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678, certiorari denied Ex parte Brantley, 191 Ala. 660, 66 So. 1008. The fact of such engagement was not directly involved as an element in the case, but was merely a circumstance whose sole ......
-
Oliver v. State
... ... 6, Sec. 24 ... In ... such, errors must be assigned and argued as in a civil case ... Otherwise, they are waived. Brantley v. State, 11 ... Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678, certiorari denied Ex parte ... Brantley, 191 Ala. 660, 66 So. 1008; Williams v ... State, 117 Ala ... ...