Ex parte City Bank & Trust Co.
Decision Date | 28 June 1917 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 997 |
Citation | 200 Ala. 440,76 So. 372 |
Parties | Ex parte CITY BANK & TRUST CO. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Petition for mandamus on behalf of the City Bank & Trust Company against Circuit Judge Turner. Mandamus denied.
C.J Torrey, of Mobile, for appellant.
Hare & Jones, of Monroeville, for appellee.
The petition is for mandamus to compel Circuit Judge Turner to reinstate the decree rendered by the special chancellor granting and decreeing a new trial in a certain equity cause entitled, City Bank & Trust Company v. J.B. Du Bose, formerly pending in the law and equity court of Monroe county, which decree was declared null and void by Circuit Judge Foster.
The contention of the respondent is that the authority of the chancellor of the law and equity court ceased when that court passed out of existence at midnight, January 14th, and that any decree rendered by him after that date was coram non judice and void. The question for decision is like unto that involved where the tribunal, which had undoubted jurisdiction of the cause at a certain stage, loses that jurisdiction at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, as illustrated by an action pending in a state court, and thereafter removed to another state court or to a national court, divesting the jurisdiction of the first court. In such a case any attempted subsequent action by the first tribunal is coram non judice. Steamship Co. v. Tugman, 106 U.S. 118, 1 Sup.Ct. 58 27 L.Ed. 87; Railroad Co. v. Koontz, 104 U.S. 14, 26 L.Ed. 643; 10 Rose's Notes, U.S.Rep. 102, 358.
It must be conceded that the law and equity court of Monroe county passed out of existence at midnight on January 14, 1917, and that the regular judge of said court had no jurisdiction over pending causes therein after the consolidation of that court with the circuit court. Gen.Acts, 1915, p. 279; Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, 73 So. 101.
The chancellor was not selected and appointed by agreement of counsel to try said cause; the "incompetency" of the judge of the court to hear and try the issues being admitted, the register in chancery appointed the special chancellor pursuant to the provisions of section 160 of the Constitution and of section 4627 of the Code. Among other things, it is there provided that such special judge or chancellor so appointed by the clerk or register shall "sit as a court," and "hear, decide, and render judgment in the same manner and to the same effect as such in competent chancellor or judge could have rendered but for such incompetency."
The legality of the acts of the special chancellor must be tested, as would be those of the regular judge of the law and equity court of said county. That court had ceased to exist, by operation of law, being consolidated into the circuit court, and it was declared in the consolidation act that:
The same conclusion was reached by the Louisiana court, where, under a provision of the Constitution, a member of the bar had been selected to sit in a cause in which the judges of the Court of Appeals were unable to agree, and before decision one of the disagreeing judges was succeeded in office by a regular judge who was qualified to decide the cause. State v. Judges, etc., 49 La.Ann. 337, 21 So. 520.
It should be borne in mind that in the instant case, there is no question of usurpation or excess of jurisdiction ( Buchanan v. Thomason, 70 Ala. 401; Baker v Barclift, 76 Ala. 414) by a lawfully constituted court or its officials, where the invalidity of the judgment must be apparent on the face of the record and may not be shown by matter extrinsic, but of usurpation of power on the part of a former official of a court that had ceased to exist by operation of law. For after midnight of January 14, 1917, the law and equity court of Monroe county and its judge and the special chancellor ceased to exist as a court and as officials. Any decree, though rendered by either of such ex-officials, under color of his former office, was void , and any void judgment may, on motion, be vacated (Baker v. Barclift, supra, 76 Ala. 417; Merrick v. City of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Martin
... ... consideration for me, his life having been such that I cannot ... trust him with funds or property to supply his ordinary ... necessities and ... Livingston, Judge, 170 Ala ... 147, 54 So. 109; Ex parte City Council of Montgomery, 114 ... Ala. 115, 14 So. 365; Ex parte ... section 2837 of the Code. Wynn, Adm'r, v. Tallapoosa ... County Bank, 168 Ala. 469, 483, 53 So. 228. The same ... effect, however, is not to ... ...
-
Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.
... ... is the owner of certain local improvement bonds issued by the ... city of Florala, Ala., under the provisions of article 33, c ... 43, of the ... Coster's Ex'rs v. Bank of Georgia, 24 Ala ... 37; Bell v. McLaughlin, 183 Ala. 548, 62 So ... In the ... case of Ex parte City Bank & Trust Co., 200 Ala. 440, 76 So ... 372, the attack was by ... ...
-
Manchuria S.S. Co. v. Harry G.G. Donald & Co.
...ceased to exist after January 14, 1917; and pending causes were transferred to the circuit court for trial or decision. Ex parte City Bank & Trust Co., 76 So. 372; Ex parte State rel. Attorney General, 73 So. 101; Gen.Acts 1915, p. 279. The rule declared in Andrews v. Grey, supra, has no ap......
-
Rice v. Davidson
... ... bill and answer may be considered, but also ex parte ... affidavits duly offered at the hearing on motion to discharge ... the chancery court was merged into and consolidated (Ex parte ... City Bank & Trust Co., 200 Ala. 440, 76 So. 372, Code, § ... 5358; Hamilton ... ...