Ex parte Consalvo
Citation | 372 So.2d 49 |
Parties | Ex parte Anna CONSALVO. 78-532. |
Decision Date | 22 June 1979 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Scaloni v. State, 3 Div. 27
...1132, and the case of Consalvo, alias v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 372 So.2d 44 by Harris, Presiding Judge; Certiorari Denied, Ex Parte Consalvo, Ala.Cr.App., 372 So.2d 49. Appellant insists that the trial court erred to her prejudice when it overruled her motion to suppress. This question togeth......
-
Bates v. State
... ... An exception to the warrant requirement exists where there are "exigent circumstances coupled with probable cause." Ex parte Hilley, 484 So.2d 485, 488 (Ala.1985); McClellan v. State, 415 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). The possibility that evidence will be destroyed is an exigent circumstance widely recognized by the courts. Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 104 S.Ct. 2091, 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984); Consalvo v. State, 372 So.2d 44 (Ala.Cr.App.), writ denied, 372 So.2d 49 (Ala.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953, 100 S.Ct. 429, 62 L.Ed.2d 324 (1979). See ... ...
- Ex parte Struggs