Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc.
Decision Date | 17 December 2004 |
Citation | 904 So.2d 226 |
Parties | Ex parte COVINGTON PIKE DODGE, INC. In re Lana M. Henderson v. Bud Purser, as administrator of the estate of Lester Williams, deceased, and as administrator of the estate of Stanley Smith, deceased; et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
John Martin Galese and Rand A. Linton of Galese & Ingram, P.C., Birmingham, for petitioner.
William Todd Atkinson of Fite, Davis, Atkinson, Guyton & Burt, P.C., Hamilton, for respondent. BROWN, Justice.
Covington Pike Dodge, Inc. ("Covington Pike"), a Delaware corporation whose principal place of business is in Tennessee, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court (1) to vacate its order denying Covington Pike's motion to dismiss, for lack of personal jurisdiction, the claims of Lana M. Henderson against it, and (2) to enter an order dismissing Henderson's claims against it. We grant the petition and issue the writ.
Facts and Procedural History
On February 28, 2002, Lester Williams purchased a used 1993 Honda Accord automobile from Covington Pike, a motor-vehicle dealership. At the time of the transaction, Williams resided in Mississippi and Covington Pike's dealership was located in Memphis, Tennessee. Williams was an employee of Covington Pike, and the Accord was delivered to him on the day of the purchase. On March 2, 2002, Stanley Smith was driving Williams's Accord when it collided with an automobile being driven by Henderson. The accident occurred in Marion County, Alabama. Both Smith and Williams, who was a passenger in the Accord, died from injuries sustained in the collision; Henderson was severely injured.
On July 30, 2002, Henderson sued Bud Purser, as administrator of the estate of Stanley Smith and as administrator of the estate of Lester Williams; Covington Pike; and Alfa Mutual Insurance Company, which provided uninsured/underinsured-motorist insurance to Henderson, in the Marion Circuit Court. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Covington Pike owned or had a right of control over the Accord, and that it had negligently and/or wantonly entrusted the Accord to Smith. Furthermore, the complaint alleged that Covington Pike negligently, recklessly, and wantonly exercised or failed to exercise supervisory control over the Accord.
On September 3, 2002, Covington Pike filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., arguing that the Marion Circuit Court lacked personal jurisdiction over it; the same motion sought, in the alternative, a summary judgment on the merits of Henderson's claims against Covington Pike (the motion is hereinafter referred to as "the motion to dismiss"). Henderson filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on August 4, 2003. In an order dated October 7, 2003, the trial court denied the motion to dismiss and reserved ruling on the summary-judgment aspect of the motion. This order was filed with the clerk of the Marion Circuit Court on November 17, 2003. Covington Pike then filed this petition for the writ of mandamus.
Standard of Review
Ex parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C., 866 So.2d 519, 525 (Ala. 2003).
""
Wenger Tree Serv. v. Royal Truck & Equip., Inc., 853 So.2d 888, 894 (Ala.2002) (quoting Ex parte McInnis, 820 So.2d 795, 798 (Ala.2001)). However, if the defendant makes a prima facie evidentiary showing that the Court has no personal jurisdiction, "the plaintiff is then required to substantiate the jurisdictional allegations in the complaint by affidavits or other competent proof, and he may not merely reiterate the factual allegations in the complaint." Mercantile Capital, LP v. Federal Transtel, Inc., 193 F.Supp.2d 1243, 1247 (N.D.Ala.2002)(citing Future Tech. Today, Inc. v. OSF Healthcare Sys., 218 F.3d 1247, 1249 (11th Cir.2000)). See also Hansen v. Neumueller GmbH, 163 F.R.D. 471, 474-75 (D.Del.1995)("When a defendant files a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), and supports that motion with affidavits, plaintiff is required to controvert those affidavits with his own affidavits or other competent evidence in order to survive the motion.") (citing Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd., 735 F.2d 61, 63 (3d Cir.1984)).1
Discussion
Covington Pike argues in its petition that it did not have sufficient contacts with the State of Alabama to subject it to the jurisdiction of the trial court. Therefore, it argues, the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss. We agree.
Dill, 866 So.2d at 525-26 (emphasis omitted). In light of these principles, this Court must determine whether Covington Pike has had sufficient contacts with Alabama to subject it to either general or specific jurisdiction.
In support of its motion to dismiss, Covington Pike included the affidavit of Derrick Daniels, its general manager. Daniels's affidavit states, in pertinent part:
Attached to the affidavit were, among other things, several documents detailing the sale of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
27001 P'ship v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
...The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the trial court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc., 904 So. 2d 226 (Ala. 2004)."'"In considering a Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction, a court must co......
-
Facebook, Inc. v. K.G.S.
...the motion.’) (citing Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd., 735 F.2d 61, 63 (3d Cir. 1984) )." Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc., 904 So. 2d 226, 229–30 (Ala. 2004). It is well settled that Alabama's long-arm rule, Rule 4.2, Ala. R. Civ. P., "extends the personal jurisdictio......
-
27001 P'ship v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (Ex parte Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.)
...The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the trial court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc., 904 So.2d 226 (Ala.2004). “ ‘ “In considering a Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction, a court must c......
-
P.B. Surf, Ltd. v. Savage (In re Alamo Title Co.), 1111541.
...the motion.”) (citing Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd., 735 F.2d 61, 63 (3d Cir.1984)).’ “Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc., 904 So.2d 226, 229–30 (Ala.2004).”Ex parte Excelsior Fin., Inc., 42 So.3d at 103.III. Analysis Alamo essentially makes two arguments for the trial......
-
Alabama's Appellate Standards of Review in Civil Cases
...(citing Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd., 735 F.2d 61, 63 (3d Cir. 1984))." "'Ex parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc., 904 So.2d 226, 229-30 (Ala. 2004).'" Ex parte Duck Boo Int'l Co., 985 So. 2d 900, 905-06 (Ala. 2007). Ex parte International Creative Management Partners, LLC......