Ex parte Daniel
Citation | 459 So.2d 948 |
Parties | Ex parte George DANIEL. (Re George Daniel v. State). 83-721. |
Decision Date | 31 August 1984 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
James R. McKoon, Jr. of Ferrell & McKoon, Phenix City, for petitioner.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and P. David Bjurberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
This Court granted certiorari in this case under Rule 39(c), A.R.A.P., to determine whether or not the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in its conclusion that petitioner was not denied competent counsel in his trial on a charge of capital homicide, § 13A-5-31(5), Code 1975, which trial occurred in November 1981. We affirm.
As the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals discloses, this Court had in an earlier decision granted certiorari, remanding this case to the Court of Criminal Appeals with directions to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the defendant's challenge to the competency of his trial counsel and to direct the trial court to make findings of fact relating to that issue. The Court of Criminal Appeals was also directed to conduct an independent review of the trial court's findings and to make a final determination of the competency-of-counsel issue. Ex parte Daniel, 459 So.2d 942 (Ala.1982). Pursuant to that mandate, the Court of Criminal Appeals, 459 So.2d 943, remanded the cause to the trial court, and the trial court conducted the prescribed evidentiary hearing and made findings in accord therewith, holding that counsel for the defendant were competent. Those proceedings were reviewed by the Court of Criminal Appeals, which then issued an opinion upholding the trial court's judgment. Daniel v. State, 459 So.2d 944 (Ala.Crim.App.1984). Following that decision, this Court again granted certiorari.
The sole issue presented by counsel to this Court on this petition is:
In making this determination, the Court of Criminal Appeals applied the "farce, sham or mockery" test and also the "reasonably effective assistance of counsel" test of Harris v. Oliver, 645 F.2d 327 (5th Cir.1981).
Subsequent to the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals on January 10, 1984, the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), established guidelines for the review of claims of deficient or ineffective counsel:
Ibid. at 104 S.Ct. 2064. That Court added, at 2065-66:
As made clear by the United States Supreme Court, an ineffective assistance claim requires not only an unreasonable error but also prejudice to the defense:
Id. at 2067. The defendant's burden was explained at 2068:
This burden was amplified at 2069:
Involving as it does the fundamental right of counsel at trial, this case properly should be reviewed under the standards adopted in Strickland, supra, even though the conduct...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hubbard v. State
...adopted the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, see, e.g., Haynes v. State, 461 So.2d 869 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Daniel v. State, 459 So.2d 948 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 459 So.2d 948 (Ala.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1009, 105 S.Ct. 1878, 85 L.Ed.2d 170 (1985), and we review this case......
-
Crowe v. State
... ... at 2064." Duncan v. State, supra. See also, Ex parte Daniel, 459 So.2d 948 (Ala.1984) ... The appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by its failure to ... ...
-
Magwood v. State
... ... Magwood v. State, 426 So.2d 918 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). That decision was affirmed by the Alabama Supreme Court on certiorari review. Ex parte Magwood, 426 So.2d 929 (Ala.1983). On July 13, 1983, the appellant filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the Circuit ... Page 963 ... State, 470 So.2d 1303 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed, 470 So.2d 1309 (Ala.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 935, 106 S.Ct. 269, 88 L.Ed.2d 276 (1985); Daniel v. State, 459 So.2d 933 (Ala.Cr.App.), remanded on other grounds, 459 So.2d 942 (Ala.1982), affirmed on return to remand, 459 So.2d 944 (Ala.), ... ...
-
Waldrop v. State
... ... Rehearing Denied March 8, 1988 ... Certiorari Denied April 22, 1988 ... Alabama Supreme Court 87-740 ... Page 476 ... Daniel R. Farnell, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant ... Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and William W. Whatley, Jr., and John Gibbs, Asst ... State, 459 So.2d 953 (Ala.Cr.App.1983). The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed this Court in Ex parte Waldrop, 459 So.2d 959 (Ala.1984). The United States Supreme Court ... Page 477 ... denied certiorari in Waldrop v. Alabama, 471 U.S. 1030, 105 ... ...