Ex parte Davis
| Decision Date | 03 May 1923 |
| Docket Number | 3 Div. 610. |
| Citation | 209 Ala. 367,96 So. 370 |
| Parties | EX PARTE DAVIS. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Petition of Frank Davis for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of said court in the case of Frank Davis v. State of Alabama, 96 So. 369.
Powell & Hamilton, of Greenville, for petitioner.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Henry v. Ide
... ... Ala. 300, 311, 40 So. 137, bill for injunction and receiver, ... it was declared that a receiver should not be appointed in ex ... parte proceedings upon the application of stockholders to ... dissolve the corporation, until after personal notice to ... resident and published notice ... ...
-
Tuggle v. State
... ... remanded ... J. B ... Powell, of Jasper, for appellant ... Harwell ... G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and O. B. Cornelius, Asst. Atty. Gen., ... for the State ... BRICKEN, ... A ... prosecution against this ... 541] jury. They do not properly ... state the law. Davis v. State (Ala. App.) 96 So ... 369, and cases cited; Ex parte Davis, 209 Ala. 367, 96 So ... Charges 3, 4, 5, and 6 were fairly and substantially covered ... by the oral charge of the court, ... ...
-
McColston v. State
... ... he appeals. Affirmed ... [104 So. 348] ... Mathews ... & Mathews, of Bessemer, for appellant ... Harwell ... G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ... the State ... BRICKEN, ... From a ... judgment of conviction for ... them; it is their duty to adopt the one or the other ... Davis v. State, 19 Ala.App. 94, 96 So. 369; Ex parte ... Davis, 209 Ala. 367, 96 So. 370. However, the court, while as ... stated, was under no duty to give this charge, yet given ... charge 2 covers ... ...
-
Woods v. State
...Refused charges one and three are identical, and were properly refused. Davis v. State, 19 Ala. App. 94, 96 So. 369; Ex parte Davis, 209 Ala. 367, 96 So. 370. charges 2 and 6 were the general affirmative charge as to the two counts in the indictment. It has already been stated the defendant......