Ex parte Davis. No. —

Decision Date08 March 1943
PartiesEx parte DAVIS. No. —-, Original
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner's previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U.S. 592, 63 S.Ct. 26, 87 L.Ed. —-, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. He contends that in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of Indiana. But we cannot assume that the Supreme Court of Indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. Until the Supreme Court of Indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal—which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this Court—the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. Accordingly, we deny petitioner's present application without prejudice.

Application denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Johnson v. Bauman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • February 22, 2022
    ...both the Supreme Court and our Court required a state prisoner to exhaust state court remedies. See Ex parte Davis , 318 U.S. 412, 412, 63 S.Ct. 679, 87 L.Ed. 868 (1943) (per curiam) (refusing to excuse exhaustion when the Supreme Court of Indiana denied an indigent pro se prisoner's reques......
  • Brown v. Allen Speller v. Allen Daniels v. Allen
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1953
    ...70 S.Ct. at page 596, 94 L.Ed. 761; Salinger v. Loisel, 265 U.S. 224, 232, 44 S.Ct. 519, 522, 68 L.Ed. 989; cf. Ex parte Elmer Davis, 318 U.S. 412, 63 S.Ct. 679, 87 L.Ed. 868. Original records in state courts are returned by this Court. (E.g., see in Daniels v. North Carolina, 339 U.S. 954,......
  • United States v. Fay
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 7, 1962
    ...of these state collateral remedies before bringing a petition for federal habeas corpus was announced in Ex parte Davis, 318 U.S. 412, 63 S.Ct. 679, 87 L.Ed. 868 (1943) (per curiam).5 The Supreme Court recognized, however, that exceptional cases might be presented in which the petitioner's ......
  • United States v. Walsh, 9635.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • April 20, 1949
    ...or seriously inadequate. (Italics supplied.) cf. Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86, 43 S.Ct. 265, 67 L.Ed. 543; Ex parte Davis, 318 U.S. 412, 63 S.Ct. 679 87 L.Ed. 868, a federal court should entertain his petition for habeas corpus, else he would be remediless. In such a case he should proceed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT