Ex parte Donahoo, 78-430.
| Decision Date | 25 May 1979 |
| Docket Number | 78-430. |
| Citation | 371 So.2d 79 |
| Parties | Ex parte Michael E. DONAHOO. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
WRIT DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Edwards v. State
...that it improperly prejudiced the jury against the defendant. Donahoo v. State, 371 So.2d 75 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 371 So.2d 79 (Ala.1979). In the instant case, the only communication that occurred between the trial court and the jury was the trial court's receipt of the original not......
-
Donahoo v. State, 7 Div. 578
...in open court with all the parties and their attorneys present." Donahoo v. State, 371 So.2d 75, 78-79 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 371 So.2d 79 (Ala.1979). Although there is nothing in the trial transcript here to indicate that improper communication with the jury occurred, see Daniels v. ......
-
Daniels v. State
...Court with all the parties and their attorneys present." Donahoo v. State, 371 So.2d 75, 78-9 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Donahoo, 371 So.2d 79 (Ala.1979). There is nothing in the record, apart from the objections and motions of defense counsel, to support the defendant's allegati......
-
Ex parte Hammond
...So.2d 662 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), cert. denied, 390 So.2d 671 (Ala.1980); Donahoo v. State, 371 So.2d 75 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 371 So.2d 79 (Ala.1979). To be sure, Alabama has even declared that the defendant's presence during every stage of his trial is jurisdictional, and that a vio......
Request a trial to view additional results