Ex parte Dustman, No. B--5850
| Court | Supreme Court of Texas |
| Writing for the Court | DANIEL |
| Citation | 538 S.W.2d 409 |
| Parties | Ex parte Robert DUSTMAN, Petitioner. |
| Docket Number | No. B--5850 |
| Decision Date | 09 June 1976 |
Page 409
McGlasson & Cox, Gene McGlasson, Jr., Canyon, for relator.
Dee D. Miller, Amarillo, for respondent.
DANIEL, Justice.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Relator, Robert Dustman, has been adjudged in contempt by the 47th District Court of Randall County for failure to make payments for the support of his minor children as required by a divorce judgment entered by that court on November 28, 1972. The contempt decree assessed a fine of one dollar against Dustman and ordered that he be committed to jail until he purges himself of the contempt by paying $4,710 in delinquent child support plus court costs amounting to $22. We order relator discharged.
Under the 1972 divorce decree, Dustman became obligated to pay child support payments of $150 per month. It appears from the record that as of October 31, 1975, only one such monthly payment had been made. Article 1911a, V.A.T.S., authorizes punishment for contempt by a fine of not more than $500 and by confinement in county jail for not more than six months. We are not concerned here with the power of the trial court to impose punishment within these limits. Rather, our consideration relates to the coercive portion of the contempt decree, the indefinite confinement of relator until payment of the $4,710 and court costs.
Page 410
The evidence bearing upon relator's ability to pay the arrearage at the time of the contempt hearing on October 31, 1975 is not controverted. He testified that he desired to pay the $4,710 as soon as possible but was unable to pay it at the time of the hearing; that he was employed by a swimming pool company; that his work week ranged from ten to forty hours per week due to the seasonal nature of the work; and that he wished to pay off the arrearage over a period of time but simply did not know how he would do so. In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, Dustman makes the following sworn statements concerning his ability to pay, which statements remain uncontradicted:
(H)e is unable to comply with the Order of the Court to pay FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND NO/100 ($4,710.00) DOLLARS by virtue of financial inability . . .. (H)e only grossed THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR AND 50/100 ($3,534.50) DOLLARS during the year of 1975. (H)e is unable to borrow the said sum to secure his release. (He) has no property he could mortgage to raise...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Luttrell v. El Paso Cnty., No. 08-16-00090-CV
...18 App.--Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied) (citing In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding); see also Ex parte Dustman, 538 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Tex. 1976) (an original habeas corpus proceeding in this Court is a collateral attack upon the contempt order, and the relator may b......
-
Luttrell v. El Paso Cnty., No. 08-16-00090-CV
...App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied) (citing In re Long , 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding); see also Ex parte Dustman , 538 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Tex. 1976) (an original habeas corpus proceeding in this Court is a collateral attack upon the contempt order, and the relator may be ......
-
Ex parte Barlow, No. 14-95-00175-CV
...is a collateral attack upon the order of contempt, and the relator may obtain relief only if the order is void. Ex parte Dustman, 538 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Tex.1976) (orig. proceeding). A contempt order is void if (1) it was beyond the power of the court or (2) it deprives the relator of his lib......
-
Ex Parte Coronado, No. 13-09-00149-CV (Tex. App. 4/9/2009), No. 13-09-00149-CV.
...he or she does not have the ability to perform the condition required for release. Rojo, 925 S.W.2d at 654; see, e.g., Ex parte Dustman, 538 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Tex. 1976) (orig. proceeding); Rohleder, 424 S.W.2d at 892. An order of contempt imposing a coercive restraint is void if the conditi......