Ex parte Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

Decision Date31 July 1998
PartiesEx parte EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and Town and Country Autos. (In re Lorenzo SANDERS v. EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.) 1970695.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Travis Holzborn of Barnett, Bugg & Lee, Monroeville, for petitioners.

Sidney W. Jackson III and Scott E. Denson of Jackson, Taylor & Martino, P.C., Mobile, for respondent.

LYONS, Justice.

Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("Empire") and Town and Country Autos ("Town & Country") petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Harold Crow, of the Circuit Court of Clarke County, to grant their motion for a summary judgment in an action filed against them by Lorenzo Sanders. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition.

In November 1992, Sanders entered into an automobile rental contract with Town & Country. As a part of that contract, Sanders purchased a "vehicle damage waiver" option whereby, for a fee, Town & Country waived its right to hold Sanders liable for any damage to the vehicle caused by him or by any other authorized driver. An exception to the damage waiver became effective if the vehicle was damaged while being driven by a person whose driving ability was impaired to any degree by intoxicating liquor or by any other substance. The vehicle subsequently was damaged while being driven by James Drinkard, who was listed on the rental contract as an authorized driver. The police report regarding the one-vehicle accident indicated that Drinkard was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident.

Empire provided automobile collision insurance coverage to Town & Country, and it paid Town & Country for the damage to the automobile Sanders had rented. In 1993, Town & Country and Empire, as Town & Country's subrogee, 1 filed in the Clarke Circuit Court a complaint against Sanders 2 to recover the amount Empire had paid to Town & Country and the deductible Town & Country had paid under the policy. Sanders did not answer the complaint, and the trial court entered a default judgment against him. Sanders later filed a bankruptcy petition, and in his bankruptcy plan he included the amount of the judgment as a debt.

In 1995, Sanders filed in Mobile County the present action against Empire and Town & Country. 3 His complaint contains counts arising from his automobile rental agreement and the damage waiver option with Town & Country and arising from the complaint filed against him by Empire and Town & Country--those counts allege breach of contract, bad faith failure to pay an insurance claim, fraud, misrepresentation, and abuse of process. Empire and Town & Country responded by filing a motion to dismiss in which they contended, among other things, that venue was improper in Mobile County and that the complaint was due to be dismissed as a matter of law because, they argued, Sanders's claims were compulsory counterclaims that should have been raised in their 1993 action against him. The Mobile County circuit judge denied that motion; however, in response to a "motion to reconsider" filed by Empire and Town & Country, the judge later transferred the case to Clarke County. After the case was transferred, Empire and Town & Country moved for a summary judgment, arguing that they were entitled to a judgment because, they claimed, as a matter of law Sanders's claims against them should have been brought as compulsory counterclaims in their 1993 action against him. Judge Crow denied their summary judgment motion on August 25, 1997. On January 26, 1998, Empire and Town & Country filed this mandamus petition.

A writ of mandamus is an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
157 cases
  • P.B. Surf, Ltd. v. Savage (Ex parte Alamo Title Co.), 1111541
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 15, 2013
    ...relief is unavailable or is inadequate, and it cannot be used as a substitute forPage 52appeal." Ex parte Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 720 So. 2d 893, 894 (Ala. 1998). A. Permissive Interlocutory Appeal Because the amount in controversy exceeded $50,000, Alamo had available the alternativ......
  • P.B. Surf, Ltd. v. Savage (In re Alamo Title Co.), 1111541.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 17, 2013
    ...where other relief is unavailable or is inadequate, and it cannot be used as a substitute for appeal.” Ex parte Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 720 So.2d 893, 894 (Ala.1998).A. Permissive Interlocutory Appeal Because the amount in controversy exceeded $50,000, Alamo had available the alterna......
  • Davis v. Self
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • February 25, 2013
    ...conclude that neither of the father's final two arguments is a proper basis for mandamus relief. See, e.g., Ex parte Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 720 So.2d 893, 894 (Ala.1998) (“A writ of mandamus will issue only in situations where other relief is unavailable or is inadequate, and it can......
  • Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. Wright
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 24, 2004
    ...it cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. Ex parte Drill Parts & Serv. Co., 590 So.2d 252 (Ala.1991).' "Ex parte Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 720 So.2d 893, 894 (Ala.1998). `This Court reviews mandamus petitions seeking review of a venue determination by asking whether the trial court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT