Ex parte General Motors Corp.
Decision Date | 10 January 1963 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 918 |
Parties | Ex parte GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Sydney Lavender and Deramus & Johnston, Birmingham, for petitioner.
McEniry, McEniry & McEniry, Bessemer, for respondent.
This is an original petition for writ of mandamus to require the Honorable Edward L. Ball, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit (Jefferson County), Bessemer Division, to vacate an order transferring the cause from the law side to the equity side of the court.
The respondent Judge has waived the issuance of a rule nisi and has filed an answer wherein he admits the truth of all averments of the petition for mandamus except those to the effect that his order transferring the cause is erroneous.
We have held that mandamus is the proper remedy to review an order transferring the cause from the law side to the equity side of the court. Ex parte Porter, 271 Ala. 44, 122 So.2d 119, and cases cited. See Moore v. Carr, 224 Ala. 275, 139 So. 269.
The complaint was filed by A. J. Knight, Jr., as plaintiff, on October 18, 1961. The parties defendant at the time the motion to transfer was filed were Tom Gloor Chevrolet, a corporation; General Motors Corporation; and 'X' corporation.
Knight's complaint consisted of two counts. Count 1 sought damages against the defendants for an alleged breach of warranty in a sale to Knight of a 1961 Chevrolet station wagon. Count 2 alleged that the plaintiff is entitled to recover certain sums allegedly paid to defendants, and others, by virtue of an alleged rescission of a sale contract by defendants. Plaintiff in Count 2 also sought damages for the two-week period when plaintiff allegedly delivered custody and control of the automobile to defendants for the purpose of correcting alleged defects in the vehicle.
On February 22 the defendant Tom Gloor Chevrolet, a corporation, filed its motion to transfer, which motion reads in pertinent parts as follows:
'Comes the Defendant, Tom Gloor Chevrolet, a corporation, and moves the court that said cause be transferred to the Chancery side of this said court and as grounds of said motion sets out and assigns as follows:
'PREMISES CONSIDERED WHEREFORE, the said Tom Gloor Chevrolet, a corporation, prays that upon a hearing of said motion said cause that it may be transferred as requested above.'
The demurrer of General Motors Corporation to the motion to transfer was overruled and an order was entered transferring the cause to the equity side. This petition for writ of mandamus followed.
Demurrer was the appropriate method of testing the sufficiency of the motion to transfer. § 153, Title 13, Code 1940; Ex parte Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 266 Ala. 551, 98 So.2d 20.
The demurrer should have been sustained for the reason that the motion was not verified 'by the affidavit of some person having knowledge of the facts' as the statute contemplates. The demurrer pointed out that defect. § 153, Title 13, Code 1940; Briggs v. Prowell, 207 Ala. 629, 93 So. 590; Ellis v. Drake, 203 Ala. 457, 83 So....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Curl
...for mandamus now before us. This is the proper method of reviewing the order transferring the cause. See: Ex parte General Motors Corporation, 274 Ala. 360, 149 So.2d 260; Edge v. Bonner, 257 Ala. 385, 59 So.2d 683; Ballentine v. Bradley, 236 Ala. 326, 182 So. 399; Whitten v. Sheffield Land......
-
Curl v. Putman, 8 Div. 267
...v. Bradley, 236 Ala. 326, 182 So. 399; Ex parte National Union Life Ins. Co., 270 Ala. 578, 120 So.2d 686; Ex parte General Motors Corp., 274 Ala. 360, 149 So.2d 260. In order to require a judgment at law to transfer a cause to equity under § 153, Supra, the motion must not only withstand s......
-
Salzmann v. Bond
... ... general issue in short by consent in the usual form ... Reversal ... ...