Ex parte Ingram
| Decision Date | 25 November 1915 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 603 |
| Citation | 195 Ala. 695,70 So. 1013 |
| Parties | Ex parte INGRAM. v. STATE. INGRAM |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
E.H. Hill, Lee & Tompkins, and Espy, Farmer & Farmer, all of Dothan, for petitioner.
W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Application of Malcolm Ingram for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court in the case of Malcolm Ingram v. State of Alabama, 69 So. 976. Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Gary v. State
... ... defendant before the killing, and for that reason was ... admissible. Moton v. State, 13 Ala. App. 43, 69 So ... 235; Ingram v. State, 13 Ala. App. 147, 69 So. 976; ... Id., 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013 ... Testimony that deceased had had trouble with other ... ...
-
Beard v. State
...as part of the res gestae . . . of the killing.' Ingram v. State, 13 Ala.App. 147, 69 So. 976, cert. den. sub nom. Ex parte Ingram, 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013. Therefore, it is proper to admit declarations made by the accused while the fatal difficulty was in progress; Brown v. State, 21 Ala......