Ex parte J.R. Kilgore & Son

Decision Date11 February 1915
Docket Number8
Citation67 So. 1002,191 Ala. 671
CourtAlabama Supreme Court
PartiesEx parte J.R. KILGORE & SON.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Action by J.R. Kilgore & Son against the Illinois Central Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff was reversed by the Court of Appeals (67 So. 707), and plaintiff petitions for certiorari. Denied.

Bankhead & Bankhead, of Jasper, for appellant.

Davis & Fite, of Jasper, for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

Petition for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review the decision of said court in the case of Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. J.R. Kilgore & Son, 67 So. 707. By the petition, review of the decision in said case is sought only as to one question, viz., whether or not the provision in the bill of lading limiting valuation, and therefore amount of recovery in event of liability, is available to the defendant to the original suit, without a special plea, the bill of lading having been offered in evidence by the plaintiff. We do not deem a discussion of the question necessary, as we conclude the opinion of the Court of Appeals in response to the application for rehearing in this case is sufficient answer to this petition, and we content ourselves with a reference thereto. Whether additional reasons might have been given we need not stop to inquire.

The writ is denied. All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Fredenburgh v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • 8 Noviembre 1968
    ...Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. J. R. Kilgore & Son, 12 Ala.App. 358, 67 So. 707 (1914); cert. denied, J. R. Kilgore & Son, Ex Parte,191 Ala. 671, 67 So. 1002 (1915); Hudson v. Wabash W. Ry. Co., 101 Mo. 13, 14 S.W. 15 (1890); see Davis v. Zimmern, 211 Ala. 63, 99 So. 307 (1924); Ward v. Curry, 34......
  • Davis v. Dawkins
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 23 Noviembre 1922
    ...... been offered in evidence by the plaintiff. Ex parte J. Kilgore & Son, 191 Ala. 671, 67 So. 1002; I. C. R. R. v. Kilgore & Son, 12 Ala. App. 358, 67 ......
  • Davis v. Zimmern
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 16 Febrero 1924
    ...that rule, if such contracts are otherwise valid. Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Kilgore, 12 Ala. App. 358, 67 So. 707, affirmed in Ex parte Kilgore, 191 Ala. 671, 67 So. 1002. In Corp. Jur. 176, § 222, it is said: "A regulation that the liability of the carrier in case of loss shall be limited to th......
  • Southern Ry. Co. v. Propst & Duckworth
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 26 Junio 1917
    ...... hold, under the authority of Ill. Central R. Co. v. J.R. Kilgore & Son, 12 Ala.App. 358, 67 So. 707, and Ex parte. J.R. Kilgore & Son, 191 Ala. 671, 67 So. 1002, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT