Ex parte Jason Dean Tulley.
| Docket Number | 1140049 |
| Decision Date | 04 September 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Glass v. City of Montgomery
...is inconsistent with state law when it "permits what a state statute forbids or forbids what a statute permits." Ex parte Tulley, 199 So.3d 812, 821 (Ala. 2015). In other words, to violate § 89, the Ordinance and the Act, which ratified and validated the Ordinance, must "make that lawful wh......
-
United States v. Lewis
...by Section 922(g)(3). 18. Tulley v. City of Jacksonville, 199 So. 3d 779, 790-91 (Ala. Crim. App. 2014), rev'd on other grounds, 199 So. 3d 812 (Ala. 2015); Stinson v. State, 28 Ala.App. 559, 190 So. 303, 304 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939). 19. See Josh Blackman, The Supreme Court's New Battlefield, ......
-
Charles K. Breland, Jr., & Breland Corp. v. City of Fairhope & the Battles Wharf / Point Clear Protective Ass'n
...and (3) "when a municipal ordinance permits what a state statute forbids or forbids what a statute permits." Ex parte Tulley, 199 So. 3d 812, 821 (Ala. 2015).The Breland parties contend that Fairhope's ordinances are invalid for two reasons: (1) the Alabama Environmental Management Act, § 2......
-
City of Ctr. Point v. Atlas Rental Prop.
... ... forbids or forbids what a statute permits." Ex parte" ... Tulley, 199 So.3d 812, 821 (Ala. 2015) ... \xC2" ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Scrutinizing 'strict scrutiny' judicial review for the right to bear arms.
...and that [section] 922(g)(9) is valid only if substantially related to an important governmental objective."). (45) Cf. Ex parte Tulley, 199 So. 3d 812 (Ala. 2015) (holding that a Jacksonville municipal statute that criminalized the act of carrying a pistol on private property facially viol......
