Ex parte Johns, 4 Div. 597
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | 195 Ala. 695,70 So. 1013 |
| Parties | Ex parte JOHNS. v. STATE. JOHNS |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 597 |
| Decision Date | 11 November 1915 |
70 So. 1013
195 Ala. 695
Ex parte JOHNS.
JOHNS
v.
STATE.
4 Div. 597
Supreme Court of Alabama
November 11, 1915
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
A.G. Seay, of Troy, for petitioner.
W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
PER CURIAM.
Petition of Sherman Johns for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and reverse the judgment and decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Johns v. State, 69 So. 259. Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 practice notes
-
Whitehead v. State, 6 Div. 335
...and the demurrers to the pleas were well taken and were sustained without error. Johns v. State, 13 Ala. App. 283, 69 So. 259; Id., 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013; Hawkins v. State, 1 Port. 475, 27 Am.Dec. 641; Gorden v. State, 71 Ala. 315; Foster v. State, 39 Ala. 229; Dominick v. State, 40 Ala......
-
McCrosky v. State, 8 Div. 755
...the unlawful having in possession of such liquors. This was decided in the Johns' Case, 13 Ala.App. 283, 69 So. 259; s.c., 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013. "The trial of this defendant for possession prohibited liquors is not a smaller offense which was included in the charge of vagrancy, and the......
-
Ex parte Ingram, 4 Div. 603
...70 So. 1013 195 Ala. 695Ex parte INGRAM. INGRAM v. STATE. 4 Div. 603Supreme Court of AlabamaNovember 25, Certiorari to Court of Appeals. E.H. Hill, Lee & Tompkins, and Espy, Farmer & Farmer, all of Dothan, for petitioner. W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Sta......
2 cases
-
Whitehead v. State, 6 Div. 335
...and the demurrers to the pleas were well taken and were sustained without error. Johns v. State, 13 Ala. App. 283, 69 So. 259; Id., 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013; Hawkins v. State, 1 Port. 475, 27 Am.Dec. 641; Gorden v. State, 71 Ala. 315; Foster v. State, 39 Ala. 229; Dominick v. State, 40 Ala......
-
McCrosky v. State, 8 Div. 755
...the unlawful having in possession of such liquors. This was decided in the Johns' Case, 13 Ala.App. 283, 69 So. 259; s.c., 195 Ala. 695, 70 So. 1013. "The trial of this defendant for possession prohibited liquors is not a smaller offense which was included in the charge of vagrancy, an......