Ex parte Level
Decision Date | 01 August 1916 |
Parties | EX PARTE LEVEL. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In Banc.
Habeas corpus on the petition of James M. Level. Petition granted and petitioner discharged from custody.
W. P Lord, of Portland, for petitioner. Walter H. Evans, Dist Atty., Arthur A. Murphy, Dep. Dist. Atty., James N. Davis and W. W. Dugan, Jr., all of Portland, for respondent Sheriff.
On Rule to Show Cause.
In response to an order made by Mr. Justice Bean, requiring the sheriff of Multnomah county to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue for the purpose of inquiring into and determining the legality of the detention by said sheriff of the petitioner, James M. Level, the parties concerned have been heard by this court, and without discussion of the merits we are of the opinion that a prima facie case has been made by the petitioner sufficient to authorize the issuance of the writ. It will therefore be issued according to the prayer of the petition.
On the Merits.
On December 19, 1912, John M. Level began an action against the petitioner and his wife for the recovery of moneys, and thereafter the defendants therein filed their answer and, at the same time, a cross-bill in equity to which John M. Level filed an answer, wherein, after certain admissions and denials, he pleads affirmatively as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Steiwer v. Steiwer
... ... report it to the court. Anthony v. Hillsboro Gold Mining ... Co., 58 Or. 258, 113 P. 442, 114 P. 95; In re ... Level, 81 Or. 298, 159 P. 558. Hence it follows that by ... making the reference the court did not lose jurisdiction of ... the subject-matter ... ...
-
Craig v. Crystal Realty Co.
...to make any findings of fact in a suit in equity. Anthony v. Hillsboro Gold Min. Co., 58 Or. 258, 113 P. 442, 114 P. 95; In re Level, 81 Or. 298, 159 P. 558. "A referee is a person appointed by the court or judicial officer with power * * * to take and report the evidence in a suit in equit......
-
Delp v. Schiel
...320 et seq. This rule of law does not, however, prevent the trial court from adopting the report of the referee as its own. In re Level, 81 Or. 298, 302, 159 P. 558. Under the circumstances, we are unable to say that the court failed to examine the evidence. On the other hand, it affirmativ......
- In re Wolfe