Ex Parte Lightwave Technologies, L.L.C.
Decision Date | 27 April 2007 |
Docket Number | 1050996. |
Citation | 971 So.2d 712 |
Parties | Ex parte LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C. (In re Lindburgh Jackson and Kathy Matthews v. City of Auburn, Alabama Power Company, and Lightwave Technologies, L.L.C.). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Steven K. Herndon and Andrew W. Christman of Gidiere, Hinton, Herndon & Christman, Montgomery, for petitioner.
Robert D. Drummond, Jr., Fairhope, for respondents Lindburgh Jackson and Kathy Matthews.
James A. Byram, Jr., and Louis M. Calligas of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Montgomery; and Edward S. Allen and Ed R. Haden of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Birmingham, for respondent Alabama Power Company.
Lightwave Technologies, L.L.C., petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals, in a plurality opinion, affirming the trial court's summary judgment in part, reversing it in part, and remanding the cause. Jackson v. City of Auburn, 971 So.2d 696 (Ala.Civ.App.2006) ( ). We granted the petition specifically to consider the Court of Civil Appeals' resolution of the issue whether, and to what extent, the holder of an easement obtained by prescription might "apportion" that easement for some additional use by another party.
Lindburgh Jackson owned property in Auburn, Alabama; Alabama Power Company (hereinafter "APCo") has maintained power lines across the property and a utility pole on the property. Over the years since he first obtained an interest in the property in 1978, Jackson occasionally complained of APCo's use and maintenance of the lines and the pole and threatened legal action against APCo. In October 1999, Jackson conveyed the property to his daughter, Kathy Matthews, although he continued to use the property for his business, and APCo's lines and pole remained on the property. Sometime between November 2000 and March 2001, Lightwave, pursuant to a "pole-sharing" agreement with APCo, installed fiber-optic cable on the utility pole on the property.1 The City of Auburn had authorized Lightwave to install its cable in Auburn and by ordinance had established the route for such placement.
In September 2003, Jackson sued various parties, including APCo, Lightwave, and the City of Auburn asserting, among other things, that APCo had conspired with Lightwave to commit trespass on the property. In 2004, Matthews was added as a plaintiff.2 After considerable litigation, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of all the defendants. Jackson and Matthews appealed to this Court, which transferred the case to the Court of Civil Appeals pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.Code 1975.
After resolving a number of issues not relevant to the present petition with respect to the City of Auburn, the Court of Civil Appeals engaged in a detailed analysis of the plaintiffs' claims against APCo and concluded that APCo, in light of undisputed evidence that it had maintained the power lines in opposition to Jackson's objections from April 1983 until September 2003, had obtained an easement by prescription over the property in question under the requirements for establishing such easements set out in Bull v. Salsman, 435 So.2d 27, 29 (Ala.1983). The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the summary judgment for APCo with respect to the plaintiffs' trespass claim against it. The Court of Civil Appeals then addressed the trespass claim against Lightwave and the conspiracy-to-commit-trespass claim against both APCo and Lightwave. We conclude that the rationale in the plurality opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this regard was well reasoned and correct, and we adopt that court's analysis as set out below as the opinion of this Court:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McInnish v. Bennett
... ... Ex parte Lightwave Techs., L.L.C., 971 So.2d 712, 720 (Ala.2007) (quoting Ex ... ...
-
BNSF Ry. Co. v. City of Augusta
... ... 432, 504 S.W.3d 606, 610 (2016); Ex parte Lightwave Tech ., 971 So.2d 712, 714 (Ala. 2007); Heydon v ... MediaOne , ... ...
-
Hanks v. Spann
... ... Ex parte Horn, 718 So.2d 694, 705 (Ala.1998). We review de novo Judge Carter's ... Ex parte Lightwave Techns., LLC, 971 So.2d 712, 718 (Ala.2007); ... Blalock v. Conzelman, ... ...
-
Millwood v. Dover
... ... Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Ex parte ... Lightwave Techs., L.L.C., 971 So.2d 712, 718 (Ala ... ...