Ex parte Limestone Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.
Decision Date | 01 December 2017 |
Docket Number | 2160996,2160995 |
Citation | 255 So.3d 210 |
Parties | EX PARTE LIMESTONE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES (In re: The Matter of A.S.H. and In re: The Matter of T.K.H.) |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and Sharon E. Ficquette, legal counsel, and Elizabeth L. Hendrix, asst. atty. gen., Department of Human Resources, for petitioner.
Edward L. Alley, Athens, guardian ad litem, as respondent.
The Limestone County Department of Human Resources ("DHR") petitions this court for writs of mandamus directing the Limestone Juvenile Court ("the juvenile court") to vacate orders entered in both of the underlying cases on August 25, 2017, and September 5, 2017. For the reasons discussed below, in each of these consolidated mandamus proceedings, we grant the petition in part and deny the petition in part.
A.H. ("the mother") and J.H. ("the father") are the parents of T.K.H., born September 17, 2010, and A.S.H., born October 7, 2012 (T.K.H. and A.S.H. are hereinafter referred to collectively as "the children"). In March 2016, the children were found to be dependent by the juvenile court and were placed in the custody of DHR. On February 2, 2017, after a hearing, the juvenile court entered orders that, among other things, identified adoption as the permanency plan for both children.
See § 12–15–315(a), Ala. Code 1975 ( ).
On February 16, 2017, DHR filed petitions to terminate the parental rights of the mother and the father to A.S.H. and T.K.H. On April 26, 2017, after a trial, the juvenile court entered orders that terminated the parental rights of the mother and the father to both children and placed the children in DHR's permanent legal custody.
On August 21, 2017, the juvenile court held a hearing ("the permanency review hearing") pursuant to § 12–15–321, Ala. Code 1975, which provides: "Where the juvenile court has terminated the parental rights and has placed legal custody of the child with the Department of Human Resources ..., the juvenile court, at least annually, shall review the circumstances of the child to determine what efforts have been made to achieve permanency for the child." On August 25, 2017, the juvenile court entered substantively similar orders in the children's cases, providing, in part:1
(Capitalization, emphasis, and bold typeface in original.) On September 1, 2017, DHR filed motions seeking transcription of both the August 21, 2017, permanency review hearing and the termination-parental-rights trial held on April 26, 2017. On September 4, 2017, DHR filed motions seeking to alter, amend, or vacate the juvenile court's August 25, 2017, orders.2 On September 5, 2017, the juvenile court entered separate orders in which it denied DHR's motions for transcription and to alter, amend, or vacate the August 25, 2017, orders. On September 7, 2017, DHR filed amended motions, to which it attached exhibits, seeking to alter amend, or vacate the August 25, 2017, orders; those motions were denied the same day. On September 7, 2017, DHR filed motions seeking to stay enforcement of the juvenile court's August 25, 2017, orders, which were also denied the same day.
On September 8, 2017, DHR timely filed a single petition for the writ of mandamus in this court, referencing both of the underlying cases. This court docketed two separate mandamus proceedings and then ordered that the proceedings be consolidated. See Rule 21(a)(3), Ala. R. App. P., and Ex parte R.W., 41 So.3d 800, 804 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Montgomery Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.
...(Ala. Civ. App. 2014) (quoting Butler v. Phillips, 3 So. 3d 922, 925 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) ). In Ex parte Limestone County Department of Human Resources, 255 So. 3d 210 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017), this court considered a petition for the writ of mandamus seeking review of an order entered after ......
- Lawson State Cmty. Coll. v. Mitchell
-
P.L.G. v. Mobile Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.
...that permanently prevents a parent from attempting to regain custody of his or her child."See also Ex parte Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 255 So.3d 210, 217 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017) (concluding that § 12-15-321, Ala. Code 1975, does not allow a juvenile court to determine the permanency ......
-
An Overview of Juvenile Court Proceedings Involving the Department of Human Resources
...determine the permanency plan for the child [after parental rights have been terminated]." Ex parte Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 255 So. 3d 210, 216 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).PROCESS FOR DEPENDENCY CASES PROCESS FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS CASES --------Notes:1. Ala. Code §§ 12-15......