Ex parte Lockwood
| Decision Date | 26 May 1894 |
| Citation | 38 L.Ed. 929,14 S.Ct. 1082,154 U.S. 116 |
| Parties | Ex parte LOCKWOOD |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Joseph Christian, for the motion.
This is an application by Belva A. Lockwood for leave to file a petition for a mandamus requiring the supreme court of appeals of Virginia to admit her to practice law in that court. Mrs. Lockwood has been for many years a member of the bar of this court, and of the supreme court of the District of Columbia, and also, she avers, of the bars of several states of the Union. Her complaint is that she recently applied to the supreme court of appeals of Virginia to be admitted to the practice of law in that court, and the court denied her application, notwithstanding it is provided by a statute of that state that ‘any person duly authorized and practicing as counsel or attorney at law in any state or territory of the United States, or in the District of Columbia, may practice as such in the courts of this state’ (Code Va. 1887, § 3192); and she alleges that the only reason for the rejection of her application was that she is a woman. It appears that no record was made of the refusal complained of, but she presents a certificate of the clerk of that court to the effect that the application was made and rejected, though ‘no order was made at the time.’ Nothing is stated in the papers before us as to the residence of petitioner, whether in the District of Columbia or in some other state than the state of Virginia. Our interposition seems to be invoked upon the ground that petitioner has been denied a privilege or immunity belonging to her as a citizen of the United States, and enjoyed by the women of Virginia, in contravention of the second section of article 4 of the constitution, and of the fourteenth amendment.
In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word ‘citizen’ is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since; but that the right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, and that amendment did not add to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Varnum v. Brien
...affirmed the refusal of the Commonwealth of Virginia to admit women into the practice of law, see Ex parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116, 118, 14 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929, 930 (1894). In each of those instances, our state approached a fork in the road toward fulfillment of our constitution's......
-
Shaw v. The City Council of Marshalltown
... ... as they existed at the time it was adopted. See, also, ... Bradwell v. State, 16 Wall. 130 (21 L.Ed. 442); ... In re Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (14 S.Ct. 1082, 38 ... L.Ed. 929); Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 (9 ... S.Ct. 231, 32 L.Ed. 623); Newton v. Board, 100 ... all times, unless such change is forbidden by the ... Constitution. Bryan v. Cattell, 15 Iowa 538; Ex ... parte Lambert, 52 Ala. 79; Taylor v. Beckham, ... 178 U.S. 548 (20 S.Ct. 890, 44 L.Ed. 1187); Donahue v ... County of Will, 100 Ill. 94 ... ...
-
Galahad v. Weinshienk
...U.S. (16 Wall.) 130, 138-139, 21 L.Ed. 442 (1873). That view was reiterated years later by the same court. In re Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116, 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 (1894). In light of The Slaughter-House Cases and its progeny, it is indeed difficult to conceptualize a privilege ......
-
Colgate v. Harvey
...v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 14 S.Ct. 570, 38 L.Ed. 485; Miller v. Texas, 153 U.S. 535, 14 S.Ct. 874, 38 L.Ed. 812; Ex parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116, 14 S.Ct. 1082, 38 L.Ed. 929; Iowa Central Ry. v. Iowa, 160 U.S. 389, 16 S.Ct. 344, 40 L.Ed. 467; Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. 1138......
-
REPUGNANT PRECEDENTS AND THE COURT OF HISTORY.
...its repeal, see generally Daniel B. Rice, The Riddle of Ruth Bryan Owen, 29 Yale J.L. & HUMAN. 1 (2017). (285.) See In re Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116, 118 (1894); Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130, 133, (286.) See Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277, 282 (1937), overruled on other grounds by ......