Ex parte Lujan
Decision Date | 02 December 1913 |
Citation | 137 P. 587,18 N.M. 310,1913 -NMSC- 081 |
Parties | EX PARTE LUJAN. |
Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Where a district court is without power to suspend the execution of the judgment in a criminal cause, or to withhold the commitment, an order so made, attempting to do so, is null and void, and without force and effect, and amounts to surplusage.
Where a defendant, duly sentenced by a district court to serve a definite term in the state penitentiary, is permitted to go and remain at large under a void order of the court, he may be taken into custody and compelled to serve the term fixed in the judgment, even though a longer period of time than that for which he was sentenced has elapsed since the sentence was imposed.
Original application for writ of habeas corpus by Juan Lujan. Petitioner remanded, and writ discharged.
On September 25, 1908, Juan Lujan, the petitioner herein, upon a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon, was by the district court of Eddy county sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of two years in the territorial penitentiary at Santa Fé, N.M. The judgment of the court was in the following words, viz
Askren & Gilbert, of Roswell, for petitioner.
Ira L Grimshaw, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
ROBERTS C.J. (after stating the facts as above).
The power to suspend the execution of a sentence in a felony case is conferred upon the district courts of the state by section 1, c. 32, S. L. 1909. The order of suspension in this case however, was made prior to the enactment of the statute, and petitioner's application for his release from the custody of the warden of the state penitentiary is predicated upon the assumption that the district court, when it sentenced petitioner upon his plea of guilty, in the absence of a statute so authorizing, had not the power to provide "that, if the defendant shall forthwith remove himself from the territory of New Mexico, the commitment hereunder shall not issue so long as he shall remain absent from the territory of New Mexico." If it be conceded that the court had the power to make the order suspending the execution of the judgment, it would follow necessarily that, upon...
To continue reading
Request your trial