Ex parte McLendon
Decision Date | 11 April 1940 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 656. |
Parties | EX PARTE MCLENDON. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied May 16, 1940.
Original petition of C. A. McLendon for mandamus to E. M. Creel, as Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, County of Jefferson requiring respondent to set aside and vacate a decree allowing alimony pendente lite and attorney's fee to defendant in the cause pending in said Circuit Court, wherein petitioner was complainant and Fannie Lou McLendon was respondent.
Mandamus denied.
Under Georgia Constitution, where, in suit by wife for divorce, a verdict of total divorce was returned, and later a second verdict of total divorce and restoring maiden name to wife was returned, a decree entered on the second verdict was not essential to a dissolution of the marriage relation.
The petition alleges that after filing of bill for divorce by petitioner, the defendant in said suit filed a motion for a reference to the register to ascertain and report, inter alia, what would be a reasonable allowance to defendant as alimony pendente lite, and what would be a reasonable solicitor's fee for her counsel. Petitioner, as complainant, filed written contest of the motion for reference. The court entered a decree of reference, in obedience to which the register caused a reference to be held. On this reference complainant offered in evidence "an exemplification of the records of the Superior Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, in cause numbered 3246, wherein Fannie Lou Hand was plaintiff and C, H. Hand was defendant", reciting that:
Complainant (petitioner here) filed motion and 3, "that there is no authority on the part of the register to proceed and hold a reference in this cause or to find that the complainant in the case at bar is liable for either alimony or solicitor's fees."
Walter S. Smith and Walter S. Smith, Jr., both of Birmingham, for petitioners.
Ellis, Lindbergh & Ellis, of Birmingham, for respondent.
This is an original petition, filed here by the complainant in a divorce proceeding, seeking to review and reverse the decree of the circuit court of Jefferson County, sitting in equity, allowing alimony pendente lite and solicitor's fees, to the defendant to aid her in defending against the charges made in the bill.
The material facts, are, that the petitioner filed his bill for divorce on September 12, 1939, against Fannie Lou McLendon alleging, inter alia:
The bill prayed for divorce a vinculo matrimonii.
On September 28, 1939, the defendant answered admitting the relation of husband and wife as alleged in the bill, but denied the existence of the alleged ground for divorce--habitual drunkenness.
On November...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McLemore v. Alabama Power Co.
...as hearsay does not become competent because it has been reduced to writing.' 31 C.J.S. Evidence, § 194, page 930; Ex parte McLendon, 239 Ala. 564, 195 So. 733; Southern Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Williams, 230 Ala. 681, 163 So. 321.' Thornton v. City of Birmingham, 250 Ala. 651, 655, 35 So.......
-
Faggard v. Filipowich, 1 Div. 246.
...Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Alexander, supra; Bell v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co., 240 Ala. 422, 199 So. 813; Ex parte McLondon, 239 Ala. 564, 195 So. 733; Walker v. Walker, 218 Ala. 16, 177 So. 472; Ex Young, 211 Ala. 508, 101 So. 51. The decree of the trial court denying relief ......
-
Thornton v. City of Birmingham
... ... hearsay, and the court ruled correctly in disallowing it. It ... would not have been permissible for appellant to testify as ... to the ex parte oral statements of the contractor and 'a ... statement otherwise objectionable as hearsay does not become ... competent because it has been reduced to writing.' 31 ... C.J.S., Evidence, § 194, page 930; Ex parte McLendon, 239 ... Ala. 564, 195 So. 733; Southern Life & Health Ins. Co. v ... Williams, 230 Ala. 681, 163 So. 321 ... An ... analogous ... ...
-
Barnett v. Barnett
...Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Alexander, supra; Bell v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co., 240 Ala. 422, 199 So. 813; Ex parte McLendon, 239 Ala. 564, 195 So. 733; Walker v. Walker, 218 Ala. 16, 117 So. 472; Ex parte Young, 211 Ala. 508, 101 So. 51.' Faggard v. Filipowich, 248 Ala. 182, 1......