Ex parte MONY Federal Credit Union
Decision Date | 16 June 1995 |
Citation | 668 So.2d 552 |
Parties | Ex parte MONY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION. Ex parte SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN COUNTY. (In re SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN COUNTY v. EMPIRE CORPORATE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and MONY Federal Credit Union). 1940337, 1940360. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Petitions for writ of Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals (AV93000713). Appeal from the Baldwin Circuit Court, No. CV-92-602, Charles C. Partin, Judge.
Charles C. Simpson III of Owens, Benton & Simpson, Bay Minette, for petitioner MONY Federal Credit Union and respondent Empire Corporate Federal Credit Union.
D. Charles Holtz and J.M. Druhan of Johnston, Wilkins, Druhan & Holtz, Mobile, for SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County.
SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County ("SouthTrust") sued Empire Corporate Federal Credit Union ("Empire") and MONY Federal Credit Union ("MONY"), alleging that they had negligently or in bad faith failed to timely notify it of the nonpayment of a certain share draft, which is the credit union version of a check, and that that omission had resulted in damages to SouthTrust of $28,762; SouthTrust sought damages in that amount, plus interest, attorney fees, and costs. The trial court dismissed SouthTrust's claim against Empire on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction, and entered a summary judgment for MONY on the ground that MONY was under no legal duty to notify SouthTrust of the non-payment. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Empire, but reversed the summary judgment for MONY. See SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County v. Empire Corporate Federal Credit Union, 668 So.2d 548 (Ala.Civ.App.1994), for a complete statement of the facts and a discussion of the legal principles relied on by the court. Both SouthTrust and MONY sought certiorari review. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
We note initially that, after carefully considering MONY's petition and briefs, we have concluded that the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that the summary judgment for MONY was improper. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals insofar as it sets aside the summary judgment entered for MONY.
However, we disagree with the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Empire. The pertinent portion of that court's opinion reads as follows:
In Dillon Equities v. Palmer & Cay, Inc., 501 So.2d 459, 461 (Ala.1986), this Court stated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Micro Experts, Inc. v. Edison Technologies, Inc.
... ... forwarded the checks for collection through the Federal Reserve Bank system. Since the stop-payment order had ... See, e.g., Ex Parte South ... Page 401 ... Bank v. Empire Corp. Fed. it Union (Ala. 1995), 668 So.2d 552; cf. Hammill Mfg. Co. v ... ...
-
Portera v. Winn Dixie of Montgomery, Inc.
...into a single step. The limits of Alabama's long-arm jurisdiction are coextensive with the limits of due process. Ex parte MONY Fed. Credit Union, 668 So.2d 552, 556 (Ala.1995). Exercising personal jurisdiction over a defendant is within the bounds of "due process when `(1) the nonresident ......
-
Thompson v. Taracorp, Inc.
...SouthTrust Bank v. Empire Corporate Federal Credit Union, (Ala.Civ.App.1994), [aff'd in part and rev'd in part, Ex parte MONY Federal Credit Union, 668 So.2d 552 (Ala.1995) ]. The fundamental question is whether there is 'a clear, firm nexus between the acts of the defendant and the consequ......
-
Williams v. Skysite Communications Corp.
... ... Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, § 1364 pp. 468-70 (2d. ed.1990)) ... , 717 So.2d 811, 812 (Ala.Civ.App.1998) (citing Ex parte MONY Fed. Credit Union, 668 So.2d 552, 554-55 (Ala.1995)) ... ...