Ex parte Nix

Decision Date10 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-491,80-491
Citation401 So.2d 64
PartiesEx parte Harold NIX and Bobby Nix. In re Ollie ESTES, et al. v. Harold NIX, et al.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

W. Stephen Graves, Montgomery, for petitioner.

John E. Enslen of Reneau, Enslen & Reneau, Wetumpka, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Under Alabama law, if a complaint contains a claim for relief that is supported by the evidence and one that is not, the defendant must challenge the claim not supported by the evidence by way of a motion for directed verdict, specific to the claim not supported by the evidence, and setting out the grounds for such motion with specificity. See, Chandler v. Hunter, 340 So.2d 818 (Ala.Civ.App.1976); Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Farell & Braley, 14 Ala.App. 380, 70 So. 986 (1915). Otherwise, if both claims go to the jury, and if a general verdict is returned, the court will presume that the verdict was rendered on the valid claim. Thrasher v. Darnell, 275 Ala. 570, 156 So.2d 922 (1963); Holley v. Crow, 355 So.2d 1123 (Ala.Civ.App.1978); Bank of Huntsville v. Witcher, 336 So.2d 1384 (Ala.Civ.App.1976). Because defendant's motion for directed verdict was specific as to the misrepresentation claim, alleging that plaintiffs failed to produce even a scintilla of evidence of misrepresentation, the Court of Civil Appeals' reversal of the judgment, 401 So.2d 62, was proper, and there is no need for the writ of certiorari to issue.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Spigener
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 26, 1986
    ...Ins. Co. v. Little, 443 So.2d 891 (Ala.1983); John Deere Indus. Equipment Co. v. Keller, 431 So.2d 1155 (Ala.1983); Ex parte Nix, 401 So.2d 64 (Ala.1981); Aspinwall v. Gowens, 405 So.2d 134 At the close of Spigener's evidence, AmSouth moved for a directed verdict as to the fraudulent concea......
  • Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union v. Poston
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 7, 1984
    ...applicable when a cause is submitted to the jury on more than one count and a general verdict is returned, is stated in Estes v. Nix, 401 So.2d 64 (Ala.1981), as "Under Alabama law, if a complaint contains a claim for relief that is supported by the evidence and one that is not, the defenda......
  • City of Huntsville v. Certain
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 20, 1984
    ...and the defective claim has been specifically challenged by a motion for directed verdict, a general verdict cannot stand. Ex Parte Nix, 401 So.2d 64 (Ala.1981). This rule of law is applicable to this case. It was error to deny the City's specific motion for directed verdict on the claim ch......
  • John Deere Indus. Equipment Co. v. Keller
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1983
    ...Coffee County Bank v. Hughes, 423 So.2d 831 (Ala.1982). See, also, Estes v. Nix, 401 So.2d 62 (Ala.Civ.App.1981), writ denied, 401 So.2d 64 (Ala.1981). For this reason, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new We also observe that the court erred as well in allowing th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT