Ex parte Price
Citation | 68 So. 866,192 Ala. 158 |
Decision Date | 22 April 1915 |
Docket Number | 597 |
Parties | Ex parte PRICE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 3, 1915
Original application by Jerome Price for writ of certiorari to reverse proceedings in the Marengo law and equity court. Petition denied.
William Cuninghame, of Linden, and W.A. Gunter, of Montgomery, for appellant.
This is an application for common-law certiorari, filed in this court, seeking to reverse certain proceedings in the Marengo law and equity court, which purport to relieve the petitioner, Jerome Price, of the disabilities of nonage. A petition for this purpose was filed in the law and equity court of Marengo county on February 4, 1914. The petition was signed by the minor and by his legal guardian, and verified by the affidavits of both. It contained the averments necessary to give the court jurisdiction in accordance with section 4505 et seq. of the Code. The application was thus made by the parties whom the statute authorizes to make it, was made to a court or judge authorized to receive it (Local Acts 1911, p. 180), and contained allegations of all the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction. The register of the law and equity court gave notice of the filing of the petition, as is directed by section 4507 of the Code. No contest was ever made of the petition.
The court later assumed jurisdiction, and the matter was set for hearing, and was heard, on the 2d day of March, 1914, when the following order was entered:
On January 15, 1915, the petitioner thus relieved filed another petition in the same court, asking to have the decree above set out canceled and annulled, on the ground that it was void for want of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Melof v. Hunt
... ... Supp. 879 cease from acting in an unconstitutional manner is not barred. Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908). This exception is, however, limited to instances in which plaintiffs seek prospective ... ...
-
Helm v. Griffith
...terms that the court was satisfied by the evidence of all facts averred which were necessary to support the decree"-citing Ex parte Price, 192 Ala. 158, 68 So. 866. ruling of our Supreme Court is in no wise in conflict with that other universally recognized rule that in tax cases where the ......
-
Hutchinson v. Till
... ... be contradicted by parol. The case was one of want of ... jurisdiction over the person ... Ex ... parte Singleton, 192 Ala. 117, 68 So. 253, ... [101 So. 677] was a mandamus proceeding to require the chancellor to ... grant a decree removing ... section 4505. The case merely holds the facts did not make a ... case for relief ... In Ex ... parte Price, 192 Ala. 158, 68 So. 866, the application was ... made, by the person authorized to make it, to a court or ... judge authorized to receive it, and ... ...
-
Helm v. Griffith
... ... that the court was satisfied by the evidence of all facts ... averred which were necessary to support the decree." Ex ... parte Price, 192 Ala. 158, 68 So. 866 ... In the ... decree we have under consideration, it is recited therein ... that the lot involved in ... ...