Ex parte Price
Decision Date | 17 February 1989 |
Citation | 555 So.2d 1060 |
Parties | Ex parte Donald C. PRICE. (Re CANTERBURY ELECTRIC COMPANY v. Donald C. PRICE). 87-1457. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Curtis W. Gordon, Jr. of Gordon, Harrison & Lathum, Birmingham, for petitioner.
John J. Coleman III of Balch & Bingham, Birmingham, for respondent.
We granted the petition for writ of certiorari, which alleged a conflict in the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case and prior holdings of this Court and the Court of Civil Appeals. The petition specifically makes reference to the essence of the Court of Civil Appeals' holding as contained in the following language from its opinion:
To the extent that the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion 555 So.2d 1059, appears to establish the invariable, abstract rule that, in all circumstances, medical causation, as an element of the employee's burden of proof, can never be found by the trial court from evidence other than that supplied by the "testimony of doctors," we agree with the petitioner. As Professor Larson points out in his treatise on the law of workmen's compensation:
3 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 79.51(a), at p. 15-426.128 (1988). Indeed, "[o]ur courts have explicitly stated that expert medical testimony is not a prerequisite to a finding of a physical disability, its degree or duration." Fruehauf Corp. v. Prater, 360 So.2d 999, 1002 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Fruehauf, 360 So.2d 1003 (Ala.1978). See, also, Grumm v. Neptune Meter Co., 472 So.2d 1067 (Ala.Civ.App.1985); City of Mobile v. Ludgood, 455 So.2d 41 (Ala.Civ.App.1984); Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. Lovett, 423 So.2d 899 (Ala.Civ.App.1982); Conagra v. White, 348 So.2d 502 (Ala.Civ.App.1977); and Stewart v. Busby, 51 Ala.App. 242, 284 So.2d 269 (1973).
In his discussion of the necessity, or not, of medical evidence on the issue of causation, Professor Larson gives several examples where the factfinder is authorized to find the causation element absent medical evidence to that effect:
3 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 79.51(b), (c), at pp. 15-426.149--.160 (1988).
As the finder of facts, then, the trial court is authorized to draw any reasonable inference from the evidence, including conclusions of medical facts that are not within the peculiar knowledge of medical experts. Warrior Stone & Contracting Co. v. De Foor, 241 Ala. 227, 2 So.2d 430 (1941). As the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion recognizes, the test is set out in Fordham v. Southern Phenix Textiles, Inc., 387 So.2d 204, 205 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 387 So.2d 206 (Ala.1980):
"To establish medical causation the employee must show that the exertion or strain or the exposure to conditions was, in fact, a contributing cause of [the employee's] injury."
Whether the claimant has satisfied this test in the absence of medical testimony, or by lay testimony coupled with medical evidence, must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
This point is also recognized by the Court of Civil Appeals: "In this instance without such testimony there is no proof of medical...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Trinity Industries, Inc.
... ... Howard, 318 So.2d at 732. "Whether the claimant has satisfied this test ... must be determined on a case-by-case basis." Ex parte Price, 555 So.2d 1060, 1062 (Ala.1989). We further stated in Price that a claimant need not always produce medical expert testimony as to the issue of medical causation in order to carry his burden of proof. Id. In determining whether substantial evidence was produced at trial as to medical causation, ... ...
-
Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC v. Purser
... ... Ex parte Coulliette, 857 So.2d 793, 79495 (Ala.2003) (explaining the necessity of a timely objection to put the trial court on notice of any error to be ... Weaver that the knee injury resulted purely from preexisting arthritis without any employment contribution. See Ex parte Price, 555 So.2d 1060 (Ala.1989) ; Hokes Bluff Welding & Fabrication v. Cox, 33 So.3d 592, 595 (Ala.Civ.App.2008) ([A] trial court may make a finding of ... ...
-
Muhammad v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
... ... his behalf and on behalf of the employee's child, for the death of the employee, he "`must establish both legal and medical causation.'" Ex parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc., 873 So.2d 1116, 1121 (Ala.2003) (emphasis added; quoting Ex parte Moncrief, 627 So.2d 385, 388 (Ala.1993)); see also ... substance'" of the evidence and viewing it "`in the full context of all the lay and expert evidence.'" 873 So.2d at 1172 (quoting Ex parte Price, 555 So.2d 1060, 1063 (Ala.1989)) (emphasis omitted). It must be remembered that our task, as an appellate court reviewing a judgment entered in a ... ...
-
KGS STEEL INC. v. McINISH, 2040526.
... ... Ex parte Trinity Indus., Inc., 680 So.2d 262, 268-69 (Ala.1996) (quoting West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida, 547 So.2d 870, 871 (Ala.1989)) ... Snell, 821 So.2d 992, 997 (Ala.Civ.App.2001): The trial court may find medical causation without testimony from medical doctors. Ex parte Price, 555 So.2d 1060 (Ala.1989). The totality of the evidence, including both lay and expert testimony, may satisfy a showing of medical causation. U.S ... ...