EX PARTE RAY
| Decision Date | 27 July 2001 |
| Citation | 809 So.2d 891 |
| Parties | Ex parte Dominique RAY. (In re Dominique Ray v. State). |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
William W. Whatley, Jr., Montgomery; and Julianna Taylor, Montgomery, for petitioner.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Beth Jackson Hughes, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.
In denying the petition, we note that the discussion by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875 (Ala. Crim.App.2001), concerning the testimony of the medical examiner and the testimony of Investigator Roy Freine is unnecessary to the resolution of the issue concerning the sufficiency of the corroborative evidence.
WRIT DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
White v. State
...; Scott v. State, 937 So.2d 1065 (Ala.Crim.App.2005) ; and Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), cert. denied, 809 So.2d 891 (Ala.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1142, 122 S.Ct. 1096, 151 L.Ed.2d 993 (2002). White was also convicted of murder made capital because it was committed d......
-
McNabb v. State
...part of C.B. was necessary to justify the challenge. See, e.g., Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875, 885 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), cert. denied, 809 So.2d 891 (Ala.2001) ("In order to justify a challenge for cause, there must be a statutory ground or some matter that imports absolute bias or favor and l......
-
Hamm v. State
...be denied. Dunning v. State, 659 So.2d 995 (Ala.Crim.App.1994)." Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875, 885 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), cert. denied, 809 So.2d 891 (Ala.2001). S.B. was not subject to exclusion for cause merely because she knew the victim's son. It might have been reasonable or prudent to gr......
-
Tomlin v. State
...citing Martinez-Salazar, has likewise found harmless error. See Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875, 886 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), cert. denied, 809 So.2d 891 (Ala.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1142, 122 S.Ct. 1096, 151 L.Ed.2d 993 (2002) ("In United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304, 120 S.Ct. 7......
Request a trial to view additional results