Ex parte Roberson
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | SHARPE, J. |
| Citation | Ex parte Roberson, 26 So. 645, 123 Ala. 103 (Ala. 1899) |
| Decision Date | 30 June 1899 |
| Parties | EX PARTE ROBERSON. |
Luther Roberson filed his petition averring that he was unlawfully confined in the county jail of Cullman county, and illegally restrained of his liberties, by virtue of a void and illegal judgment rendered against him in a case in which he was prosecuted under an indictment for grand larceny. The prayer of the petition was that a writ of habeas corpus be issued and that the petitioner be discharged. The judgment of the circuit court of Cullman county was made an exhibit to the petition, and the facts in reference thereto are sufficiently shown in the opinion. Denied.
J. J Curtis and F. E. St. John, for petitioner.
Charles G. Brown, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The transcript made part of this petition shows that the petitioner was convicted in the circuit court of Cullman county upon an indictment for grand larceny, and that upon the verdict judgment was rendered "that the defendant be, and he hereby is, sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of twenty-five months as a punishment for said offense." Though it does omit to expressly adjudge the defendant's guilt, the judgment sentencing the defendant to the penitentiary sufficiently implies the judgment of guilt, and is a judgment of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Hardaman v. State
...incarceration; and, if there was no other error in the record, the judgment would have to be reversed for this reason. Roberson v. State, 123 Ala. 55, 26 So. 645. For errors pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded. On Rehearing. In the applica......
-
Shirley v. State
... ... this court that this sufficiently implies the judgment of ... guilt and is a judgment of conviction which will support an ... appeal. Ex parte Roberson, 123 Ala. 103, 26 So. 645, 82 Am ... St. Rep. 107; Talbert's Case, 140 Ala. 96, 37 So. 78; ... Driggers' Case, 123 Ala. 46, 26 So. 512; ... ...
-
Elliott v. State, 7 Div. 765
...written by Justice Anderson, with concurrences on the part of Justices McClellan, Mayfield and Sayre. See, also, Ex parte Roberson, 123 Ala. 103, 26 So. 645, 82 Am.St.Rep. 107; Shirley v. State, 144 Ala. 35, 40 So. 269(1); Talbert v. State, 140 Ala. 96, 37 So. 78; Driggers v. State, 123 Ala......
-
Poellnitz v. State
...State, 19 Ala.App. 403, 94 So. 681; Shirley v. State, 144 Ala. 35, 40 So. 269; Talbert v. State, 140 Ala. 96, 37 So. 78; Ex parte Roberson, 123 Ala. 103, 26 So. 645. On the authority of the cases cited, we hold the judgment to be sufficient to support appellant's No error appearing in the r......