Ex Parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc.
Decision Date | 29 February 2008 |
Docket Number | 1061613. |
Citation | 990 So.2d 344 |
Parties | Ex parte SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALABAMA, INC. (In re Michelle J. Galvin v. Clifford W. Monday, an individual; and Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc., a corporation). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
J. Mark Hart of Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC, Birmingham, for petitioner.
James H. Wettermark of Wettermark Holland & Keith, LLC, Birmingham, for respondent.
Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc., petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing Judge J. Scott Vowell of the Jefferson Circuit Court to vacate his order denying its motion to dismiss Michelle J. Galvin's bad-faith claim against it and to enter an order dismissing that claim without prejudice. We grant the petition and issue the writ.
Safeway issued an insurance policy to Galvin that included uninsured-motorist ("UM") coverage; that policy was in effect on March 31, 2006, when Galvin's automobile was struck by an automobile driven by Clifford W. Monday.
On April 16, 2007, Galvin filed a complaint, alleging claims of negligence and wantonness against Monday and a claim of bad-faith failure to pay an insurance claim against Safeway and asserting a demand for the payment of UM benefits under the policy. According to Galvin's complaint, Galvin was injured in the accident and Monday, an uninsured motorist at the time of the accident, was driving while intoxicated. Galvin further stated that after she filed a claim for UM benefits with Safeway, Safeway "refused to negotiate in good faith to pay the appropriate proceeds of the [UM] policy to [her] to compensate her for her injuries and damages." Specifically, she averred:
On May 20, 2007, Safeway filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Ala. R. Civ. P., alleging that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the bad-faith claim. Safeway argued that this Court's holding in Pontius v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 915 So.2d 557, 565 (Ala.2005), that "there can be no bad-faith action based on conduct arising before the uninsured motorist's liability is established and damages are fixed...." required dismissal of the bad-faith claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Safeway argued that Galvin's bad-faith claim was not ripe for adjudication and that it should be dismissed because the amount of damages had not yet been fixed.1 Safeway stated:
On June 27, 2007, Galvin filed a response, attaching in support of her argument that the bad-faith claim against Safeway should not be dismissed an affidavit of her attorney, James H. Wettermark. Wettermark averred as follows:
On July 5, 2007, the trial court denied Safeway's motion to dismiss. Safeway filed a motion for reconsideration. In its motion, Safeway, relying on Pontius, argued that because the amount of damages had not been fixed and Safeway did not have all Galvin's medical records relating to the accident, Safeway could not have engaged in bad faith in failing to negotiate in good faith and that, consequently, the claim was not ripe for adjudication and should be dismissed. In support of its motion for reconsideration, Safeway attached an affidavit from Richard Mizell, Safeway's assistant claim manager. Mizell averred:
On August 2, 2007, the trial court denied Safeway's motion for reconsideration. On August 10, 2007, Safeway filed its petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court, requesting this Court to order the trial court to dismiss the bad-faith claim against it.
Ex parte Tuscaloosa County Special Tax Bd., 963 So.2d 610, 611-12 (Ala.2007).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
King v. Tatum (Ex parte Tatum)
...the petitioners' mandamus petition despite the lack of sufficient factual predicates for jurisdiction. See Ex parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc., 990 So.2d 344, 349 (Ala. 2008) (quoting Erby v. United States, 424 F.Supp.2d 180, 182 (D.D.C.2006) ).I respectfully disagree with Justice Pa......
-
Weinstein v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Docket No. 34970-2008 (Idaho 6/1/2010)
...both first party claims and third party claims." Condio v. Erie Ins. Exch., 899 A.2d 1136, 1143 (Pa. 2006); accord Ex Parte Safeway Ins. Co., 990 So. 2d 344, 351 (Ala. 2008). Of course, UM claims are similar to first-party claims in that the insured is claiming directly against the insurer ......
-
Dockery v. City of Jasper
...and remanding the cause for the juvenile court to vacate that portion of its judgment); see also Ex parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc., 990 So. 2d 344, 353 (Ala. 2008) (concluding that an order adjudicating a claim over which the circuit court lacks jurisdiction is due to be vacated an......
-
Easterling v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.
...1168 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006) ; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bennett, 974 So.2d 959, 962 (Ala. 2007) ; Ex parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc., 990 So.2d 344, 351 (Ala. 2008) ; Jenkins v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 30 So.3d 414, 417 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) ; McKinney v. Nationwide M......